Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36378030›Full record

ArticleRadiology2023

Deep Learning to Simulate Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI of Invasive Breast Cancer.

Maggie Chung, Evan Calabrese, John Mongan, Kimberly M Ray, Jessica H Hayward, Tatiana Kelil, Ryan Sieberg, Nola Hylton, Bonnie N Joe, Amie Y Lee

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Acquisition of KQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maggie Chung *From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0002-8144-381X
Evan Calabrese *From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-0354
John MonganFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0003-2765-7451
Kimberly M RayFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0002-8030-9563
Jessica H HaywardFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0001-9396-9272
Tatiana KelilFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-3839
Ryan SiebergFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Nola HyltonFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-1662
Bonnie N JoeFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0001-9333-1463
Amie Y LeeFrom the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M391, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-5023
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Biomedical Imaging for Clinician ScientistsT32EB001631 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LINK · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
Quantitative Imaging for Assessing Breast Cancer Response to TreatmentU01CA225427 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HYLTON-WATSON, NOLA M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225427NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is increasing interest in noncontrast breast MRI alternatives for tumor visualization to increase the accessibility of breast MRI. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of generating simulated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted breast MRI scans from precontrast MRI sequences in biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer with use of deep learning. Materials and Methods Women with invasive breast cancer and a contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination that was performed for initial evaluation of the extent of disease between January 2015 and December 2019 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. A three-dimensional, fully convolutional deep neural network simulated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted breast MRI scans from five precontrast sequences (T1-weighted non-fat-suppressed [FS], T1-weighted FS, T2-weighted FS, apparent diffusion coefficient, and diffusion-weighted imaging). For qualitative assessment, four breast radiologists (with 3-15 years of experience) blinded to whether the method of contrast was real or simulated assessed image quality (excellent, acceptable, good, poor, or unacceptable), presence of tumor enhancement, and maximum index mass size by using 22 pairs of real and simulated contrast-enhanced MRI scans. Quantitative comparison was performed using whole-breast similarity and error metrics and Dice coefficient analysis of enhancing tumor overlap. Results Ninety-six MRI examinations in 96 women (mean age, 52 years ± 12 [SD]) were evaluated. The readers assessed all simulated MRI scans as having the appearance of a real MRI scan with tumor enhancement. Index mass sizes on real and simulated MRI scans demonstrated good to excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73-0.86;

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningBreastContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID36378030
PMCPMC9974793
OpenAlexW4309048189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.