Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377937›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Deletion of Double Copies of the US1 Gene Reduces the Infectivity of Recombinant Duck Plague Virus

Ying Wu, Silun Tan, Qing He, Mingshu Wang, Shun Chen, Renyong Jia, Qiao Yang, Dekang Zhu, Mafeng Liu, Xinxin Zhao and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying Wu *Institute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Silun Tan *Institute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Qing He *Institute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Mingshu WangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Shun ChenInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7488-1037
Renyong JiaInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Qiao YangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Dekang ZhuAvian Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine of Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Mafeng LiuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6834-3128
Xinxin ZhaoInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Shaqiu ZhangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Juan HuangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Xumin OuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Sai MaoInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Qun GaoInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Di SunInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Bin TianInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.
Anchun ChengInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural Universitygrid.80510.3c, Wenjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6093-353X
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duck plague caused by duck plague virus (DPV) is one of the main diseases that seriously endangers the production of waterfowl. DPV possesses a large genome consisting of 78 open reading frames (ORFs), and understanding the function and mechanism of each encoded protein in viral replication and pathogenesis is the key to controlling duck plague outbreaks. US1 is one of the two genes located in the repeat regions of the DPV genome, but the function of its encoded protein in DPV replication and pathogenesis remains unclear. Previous studies found that the US1 gene or its homologs exist in almost all alphaherpesviruses, but the loci, functions, and pathogenesis of their encoded proteins vary among different viruses. Here, we aimed to define the roles of US1 genes in DPV infection and pathogenesis by generating a double US1 gene deletion mutant and its revertant without any mini-F cassette retention.

Indexed as

Herpesviridae InfectionsMardivirusAnimalsDucksVirus Replicationduck plague virusICP22in vitroin vivopathogenesisreplicationtranscriptionUS1

Identifiers

PMID36377937
PMCPMC9784771
OpenAlexW4309048205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.