Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377787›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Achieving improved accuracy for imputation of ancient DNA.

Kristiina Ausmees, Carl Nettelblad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Imputation of ancient canid genomes reveals inbreeding history over the past 10,000 years.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genotyping of SNPs in bread wheat at reduced cost from pooled experiments and imputation.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristiina AusmeesDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 05, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6212-539X
Carl NettelbladDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 05, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0458-6902

Funding

Formas 2017-00453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenotype imputation has the potential to increase the amount of information that can be gained from the often limited biological material available in ancient samples. As many widely used tools have been developed with modern data in mind, their design is not necessarily reflective of the requirements in studies of ancient DNA. Here, we investigate if an imputation method based on the full probabilistic Li and Stephens model of haplotype frequencies might be beneficial for the particular challenges posed by ancient data.

resultsWe present an implementation called prophaser and compare imputation performance to two alternative pipelines that have been used in the ancient DNA community based on the Beagle software. Considering empirical ancient data downsampled to lower coverages as well as present-day samples with artificially thinned genotypes, we show that the proposed method is advantageous at lower coverages, where it yields improved accuracy and ability to capture rare variation. The software prophaser is optimized for running in a massively parallel manner and achieved reasonable runtimes on the experiments performed when executed on a GPU. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The C++ code for prophaser is available in the GitHub repository https://github.com/scicompuu/prophaser. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientSoftwareAnimalsDogsEthnicityGenotypeHaplotypesHumansDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID36377787
PMCPMC9805568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.