Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377569›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2023

Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of Dependence Measures for Exclusive Electronic Cigarette Users.

Andrea R Milstred, Ashley E Douglas, Katelyn F Romm, Melissa D Blank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Abuse Liability of Electronic Cigarettes in Never-Smoking Electronic Cigarette Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. What is the Addictive Potential from Vaping?Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea R MilstredDepartment of Psychology, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26508, USA.
Ashley E DouglasDepartment of Psychology, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26508, USA.
Katelyn F RommDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Melissa D BlankDepartment of Psychology, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26508, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-7224

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI ROBERT S. MANNEL · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Testing a Digital Therapeutic for Smoking Cessation among Hispanic Persons who SmokeU54MD015946 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI MICHAEL J. ZVOLENSKY · 2020 to 2026
$22.0M
Research Training Program in Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM132494 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Anne Courtney DeVries, Kevin T Larkin · 2019 to 2026
$2.8M
Helping Everyone Achieve a LifeTime of Health - Future Addiction Scientist TrainingR25DA054015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI OBASI, EZEMENARI M., REITZEL, LORRAINE R · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA054015NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132494NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD015946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtant electronic cigarette (ECIG) dependence measures are largely adapted from those designed for cigarette smoking, though few have been evaluated for their psychometric properties. AIMS AND

methodsNever-smoking ECIG users (N = 134) participating in an online survey completed four dependence measures: Penn state electronic cigarette dependence index (PSECDI), e-cigarette dependence scale (EDS-4), diagnostic and statistical manual for tobacco use disorder (DSM-5), and Glover Nilsson behavioral questionnaire (GNBQ). They also reported on their ECIG use characteristics (eg, behaviors and reasons).

resultsInternal consistency was highest for the EDS-4 (Cronbach's α = 0.88) followed by the GNBQ (α = 0.75), PSECDI (α = 0.72), and DSM (α = 0.71). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a single-factor structure for the PSECDI, EDS-4, and GNBQ. For the DSM-5, however, two items did not load significantly (ECIG use interferes with responsibilities; reduce/give up activities because of ECIG use). Significant correlations were observed between all measures and the number of ECIG use days/week and/or years using ECIGs, as well as between DSM-5 scores and the number of ECIG quit attempts and initiation age. Endorsement of using ECIGs because "I like flavors" was correlated positively with DSM-5 and GNBQ scores.

conclusionsAll dependence measures evaluated herein demonstrated adequate reliability and construct validity. Future work should focus on determining which aspects of dependence are those that are unique to ECIG use, and subsequently developing a more comprehensive measure of ECIG dependence. IMPLICATIONS: The measures assessed herein-PSECDI, EDS-4, DSM-5, and GNBQ-demonstrated adequate to good reliability and construct validity among a sample of never-smoking ECIG users. The dependence domains covered across measures were related yet distinct. Findings demonstrate the need for future evaluation of these different domains to determine which are the most salient characteristics of ECIG dependence.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco Use DisorderVapingHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSmokers

Identifiers

PMID36377569
PMCPMC9910153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.