Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377495›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2023

A review of attentional bias modification trainings for depression.

Guo Li, Xueli Cai, Qian Yang, Qian Cui, Lihui Huang, Xiujuan Jing, Yifeng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of Attentional Bias on Emotions in Patients with Breast Cancer.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Guo LiPsychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Xueli CaiPsychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Qian YangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Qian CuiSchool of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lihui HuangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Xiujuan JingTianfu College of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Yifeng WangInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-9986
Sichuan Normal University · CNSouthwest Jiaotong University · CNSouthwestern University of Finance and Economics · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative attentional bias is a basic character of depression. The attentional bias modification training (ABMT), being a highly promising and easy-to-use depression intervention technique, has attracted much attention to alleviate depressive symptoms in recent years. However, the effectiveness of ABMT programs was mixed across studies, since it remained unclear the underlying mechanisms of ABMT on alleviating depressive symptoms. We systematically analyzed the main ABMT paradigms to clarify possible mechanisms of effective training and reasons of ineffective training. Valid ABMT programs might alleviate depressive symptoms through regulating self-related rumination or two subcomponents of attentional bias: facilitated attention and impaired attentional disengagement. The reasons for the invalidity of ABMT mainly included the suboptimal design of training procedures, mixed effects of participants' personal characteristics, and the unclear relationship between attentional bias and depression. The ABMT is promising for alleviating depressive symptoms, but training procedures are required to be improved to obtain stable training effects.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasDepressionHumansattentional bias modification trainingdepressionnegative attentional biasrumination

Identifiers

PMID36377495
PMCPMC9928546
OpenAlexW4309098700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.