Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377321›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Generalized models for quantifying laterality using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound.

Paul A Thompson, Kate E Watkins, Zoe V J Woodhead, Dorothy V M Bishop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul A ThompsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-6913
Kate E WatkinsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-482X
Zoe V J WoodheadDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0462-6791
Dorothy V M BishopDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2448-4033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider how analysis of brain lateralization using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound (fTCD) data can be brought in line with modern statistical methods typically used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Conventionally, a laterality index is computed in fTCD from the difference between the averages of each hemisphere's signal within a period of interest (POI) over a series of trials. We demonstrate use of generalized linear models (GLMs) and generalized additive models (GAM) to analyze data from individual participants in three published studies (N = 154, 73 and 31), and compare this with results from the conventional POI averaging approach, and with laterality assessed using fMRI (N = 31). The GLM approach was based on classic fMRI analysis that includes a hemodynamic response function as a predictor; the GAM approach estimated the response function from the data, including a term for time relative to epoch start (simple GAM), plus a categorical index corresponding to individual epochs (complex GAM). Individual estimates of the fTCD laterality index are similar across all methods, but error of measurement is lowest using complex GAM. Reliable identification of cases of bilateral language appears to be more accurate with complex GAM. We also show that the GAM-based approach can be used to efficiently analyze more complex designs that incorporate interactions between tasks.

Indexed as

BrainFunctional LateralityHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialfMRIfTCDgeneralized additive model (GAM)generalized linear model (GLM)laterality

Identifiers

PMID36377321
PMCPMC9783456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.