Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377305›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Evaluating the role and effectiveness of co-produced community-based mental health interventions that aim to reduce suicide among adults: A systematic review.

Claire A Hanlon, David McIlroy, Helen Poole, Jennifer Chopra, Pooja Saini

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06629220 (Co-creation of Tools for Men With Suicidal Thoughts and/or Behavior), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06629220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Co-creation of Tools for Men With Suicidal Thoughts and/or Behavior

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2025 to 2026Enrolled13ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal BehaviourArmsTools
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the role and effectiveness of co-produced community-based mental health interventions that aim to reduce suicide among adults: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Are codesigned programmes more difficult to implement? A qualitative study of staff perceptions on the implementation of a new youth mental health programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  14. A qualitative evaluation of a co-design process involving young people at risk of suicide.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claire A HanlonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2684-0123
David McIlroySchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Helen PooleSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Jennifer ChopraSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Pooja SainiSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide is a major public health risk requiring targeted suicide prevention interventions. The principles of co-production are compatible with tailoring suicide prevention interventions to meet an individual's needs.

aimsThis review aimed to evaluate the role and effectiveness of co-produced community-based suicide prevention interventions among adults.

methodsFour electronic databases (PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE and web of science) were systematically searched. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

resultsFrom 590 papers identified through searches, 14 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most included studies elicited the views and perspectives of stakeholders in a process of co-design/co-creation of community-based suicide prevention interventions.

conclusionStakeholder involvement in the creation of community-based suicide prevention interventions may improve engagement and give voice to those experiencing suicidal crisis. However, there is limited evaluation extending beyond the design of these interventions. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of co-produced community-based suicide prevention interventions. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: This paper is a systematic review and did not directly involve patients and/or the public. However, the findings incorporate the views and perspectives of stakeholders as reported within the studies included in this review, and the findings may inform the future involvement of stakeholders in the design, development and delivery of community-based suicide prevention interventions for adults.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSuicideAdultHumansSuicidal IdeationSuicide Preventionadults mental healthcommunity-basedco-productionsuicidesuicide preventionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36377305
PMCPMC9854311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.