Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36377259›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2023

Crohn's disease shared decision making intervention leads to more patients choosing combination therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Yaara Zisman-Ilani, Kimberly D Thompson, Lori S Siegel, Todd Mackenzie, Damara J Crate, Joshua R Korzenik, Gil Y Melmed, Patricia Kozuch, Bruce E Sands, David T Rubin and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02084290 (Evaluating a Prediction Tool and Decision Aid for Patients With Crohn's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02084290 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating a Prediction Tool and Decision Aid for Patients With Crohn's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2014 to 2018Enrolled204ConditionsCrohn's DiseaseArmsShared Decision Making Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological interventions for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 4 countries.

Yaara Zisman-IlaniDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-2583
Kimberly D ThompsonSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Lori S SiegelClimate Interactive, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Todd MackenzieGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Biomedical Data Science, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Damara J CrateSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Joshua R KorzenikDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gil Y MelmedInflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Patricia KozuchInflammatory Bowel Disease Program, Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bruce E SandsDr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
David T RubinSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5647-1723
Miguel D RegueiroCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Raymond CrossDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-5196
Douglas C WolfAtlanta Gastroenterology Associates, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
John S HansonAtrium Health Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Ronald M SchwartzMNGI Digestive Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Raluca VrabieGastroenterology Division, New York University, New York City, New York, USA.
Michael D KreinesGastro Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Timothy SchererSouthern New Hampshire Health, Nashua, New Hampshire, USA.
Marla C DubinskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Susan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Center, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Corey A SiegelSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USActive Technologies (Italy) · ITAtlanta Gastroenterology Associates · USAtrium Medical Cente · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCincinnati Health Department · USCity University of New York · USCleveland Clinic · USDartmouth College · USJefferson University Hospitals · USLanguage Science (South Korea) · KRMNGI Digestive Health · USSouthern New Hampshire Medical Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Evaluating a Prediction Tool and Decision Aid for Patients with Crohn's DiseaseR01HS021747 · AHRQ · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SIEGEL, COREY · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Examining the effectiveness of a shared decision making intervention for antipsychotic medications to improve engagement in treatment for people experiencing early psychosisR34MH128497 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI DIXON, LISA B., ZISMAN-ILANI, YAARA · 2022 to 2023
$499k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS021747NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH128497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrohn's disease requires effective patient-clinician communication for successful illness and medication management. Shared decision making (SDM) has been suggested to improve communication around early intensive therapy. However, effective evidence-based SDM interventions for Crohn's disease are lacking, and the impact of SDM on Crohn's disease decision making and choice of therapy is unclear.

aimTo test the impact of SDM on choice of therapy, quality of the decision and provider trust compared to standard Crohn's disease care.

methodsWe conducted a multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial in 14 diverse gastroenterology practices in the US.

resultsA total of 158 adult patients with Crohn's disease within 15 years of their diagnosis, with no prior Crohn's disease complications, and who were candidates to receive immunomodulators or biologics, participated in the study. Among these, 99 received the intervention and 59 received standard care. Demographics were similar between groups, although there were more women assigned to standard care, and a slightly shorter disease duration among those in the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group more frequently chose combination therapy (25% versus 5% control, p < 0.001), had a significantly lower decisional conflict (p < 0.05) and had greater trust in their provider (p < 0.05).

conclusionsWith rapidly expanding medication choices for Crohn's disease and slow uptake of early intensive therapy, SDM can personalise treatment strategies and has the potential to move the field of Crohn's disease management forward with an ultimate goal of consistently treating this disease early and intensively in appropriate patients.

trial registrationEvaluating a Shared Decision Making Program for Crohn's Disease, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02084290 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02084290.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseAdultDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID36377259
PMCPMC9790033
OpenAlexW4309026658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.