ArticleDrug and alcohol review2023
A retrospective chart review of trauma-related documentation in an Australian substance use treatment service.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex trauma and perceived barriers to treatment among people accessing a supervised injecting facility.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- A retrospective chart review of trauma-related documentation in an Australian substance use treatment service.Drug and alcohol review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTrauma exposure among clients of substance use treatment services is almost universal and rates of trauma-related symptoms are correspondingly high. This study examined one aspect of clinical care-clinical documentation-and sought to systematically assess the documentation of trauma-related comorbidities and their treatment in a substance use treatment setting.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on a sample of 300 patient records in a public substance use treatment setting. Rates of documentation of trauma-related events, symptoms and treatment, along with variables influencing the documentation of these issues, were examined.
resultsTrauma-related documentation was present in 45.3% of records. There were documented trauma-related symptoms in 15.3% of records, although treatment activities addressing trauma were only present in 2.3% of records. Being female (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42, 4.69), having prior mental health treatment (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.05, 1.12) and having more treatment sessions (OR 1.08, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.12) increased the odds of trauma-related documentation being present, while being in the first episode of treatment (OR 0.49, 95% CI = 0.28, 0.84) decreased the odds. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThis study highlights significant under documentation of trauma-related comorbidities in substance-use treatment. There is limited evidence of consideration of trauma-related symptoms or diagnoses, and trauma-related comorbidities are rarely included in treatment planning activities. The lack of documented trauma-related information has important clinical and medico-legal implications for patients, and provides evidence to suggest a lack of integration of treatment for trauma-related disorders in substance use settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.