ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2022
An educational video on long-acting reversible contraception as a counseling tool for postpartum adolescents.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Etonogestrel Subdermal Implant in Adolescents: Everything We Should Know to Conduct Proper Counseling, a Narrative Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Knowledge, attitude and practice of puerperal adolescents after an educational intervention on the mini contraceptive pill.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2024Article
- Reproductive care in Thai women with diabetes mellitus: a descriptive cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effects of using an animated local language educational video to counsel postpartum adolescents on the benefits and use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). MATERIALS AND
methodsA two-stage, single group, experimental study was conducted. A total of 124 female adolescents aged < 20 years who had given birth within the last six weeks participated in the study. An educational video and a questionnaire were developed and validated. Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire on basic demographic data, contraception preferences, and 10 true/false statements to test general contraceptive knowledge, after which they were shown an educational video in a private room. Following this, participants completed the second part of the questionnaire that assessed their knowledge using the same true/false statements and contraception preferences administered earlier.
resultsThe mean age (standard deviation) of participants was 18.1 (1.5) years. Participants' mean age (SD) at the time of their first sexual intercourse was 16.2 (1.6) years. Among the 124 participants, 31 (25%) indicated that they would use LARC before viewing the educational video. After viewing the educational video, this number increased to 48 (38.7%). The participants' knowledge score was independently associated with their preference to select LARC (adjusted odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.09- 1.97).
conclusionThis study demonstrated that counseling tools such as animated local language educational video might effectively improve contraceptive knowledge and the preference for LARC in postpartum adolescents. An educational video regarding LARC could be used as a counseling tool for postpartum adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.