Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36376898›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

The 14-item short health anxiety inventory (SHAI-14) used as a screening tool: appropriate interpretation and diagnostic accuracy of the Swedish version.

Susanna Österman, Erland Axelsson, Nils Lindefors, Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf, Maria Hedman-Lagerlöf, Dorian Kern, Cecilia Svanborg, Volen Z Ivanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanna ÖstermanCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. susanna.osterman@ki.se.
Erland AxelssonDivision of psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 6, SE-17165, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nils LindeforsCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik Hedman-LagerlöfDivision of psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 6, SE-17165, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria Hedman-LagerlöfCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Norra Stationsgatan 69, SE-113 64, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dorian KernDivision of psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 6, SE-17165, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia SvanborgCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Volen Z IvanovCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 14-item Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI-14) is a common measure of health anxiety but its screening properties have not been studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate the SHAI-14 as a screening instrument, identify cut-offs for clinically significant health anxiety and investigate which scores correspond to different severity levels.

methodThe study included 1729 psychiatric patients and 85 healthy controls. Participants completed the SHAI-14 and underwent a diagnostic interview. Cut-off scores were evaluated in three scenarios to approximate screening 1) in a psychiatric clinic, 2) in a low prevalence setting and, 3) of healthy volunteers (cut-off for remission). Receiver operating characteristics were used. Classification of severity was based on the distribution of SHAI-14 scores reported by patients with clinically significant health anxiety.

resultsThe area under the curve (AUC) values were high in all scenarios (above 0.95). The optimal cut-off scores on the SHAI-14 were 22 in the psychiatric context, 29 in a setting with low prevalence of psychiatric disorders and 18 versus healthy controls. SHAI-14 scores of 0-27 represented no or mild health anxiety, 28-32 moderate health anxiety and 33-42 substantial health anxiety.

conclusionBrief self-report measures used as screening instruments are a simple way of gathering information about the presence of specific symptoms and thus a way to detect the likelihood of a diagnosis. The SHAI-14 shows evidence of good diagnostic utility in both clinical and non-clinical settings. However, which cut-off score is to be used, depends on the intended purpose and the setting where the cut-off is used.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansMass ScreeningPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenHealth anxietyHypochondriasisPsychometricsROC curveScreeningShort health anxiety inventory

Identifiers

PMID36376898
PMCPMC9664720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.