Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36376755›Full record

ArticleNature plants2022

Natural allelic variation confers high resistance to sweet potato weevils in sweet potato.

Xu Liu, Yaru Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Guoguo Mei, Yinyin Liao, Shunfa Rao, Shuquan Li, Ao Chen, Hongjie Liu, Lanting Zeng and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Plant strategies against herbivorous insects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A natural variant of anProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xu Liu *Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1970-0608
Yaru Wang *Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hongbo Zhu *College of Coastal Agriculture Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Guoguo Mei *Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yinyin Liao *Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Shunfa RaoKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-1566
Shuquan LiKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ao ChenKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hongjie LiuKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Lanting ZengKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yangyang XiaoKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoming LiKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ziyin YangKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xingliang HouKey Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, the Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China. houxl@scbg.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3964-2372
South China Botanical Garden · CNGuangdong Ocean University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) is a major root crop worldwide. Sweet potato weevils (SPWs) pose one of the most significant challenges to sweet potato production in tropical and subtropical regions, causing deleterious economic and environmental effects. Characterizing the mechanisms underlying natural resistance to SPWs is therefore crucial; however, the genetic basis of host SPW resistance (SPWR) remains unclear. Here we obtained two sweet potato germplasm with high SPWR and, by map-based cloning, revealed two major SPW-resistant genes-SPWR1 and SPWR2-that are important regulators of natural defence against SPWs. The SPW-induced WRKY transcriptional factor SPWR1 directly activates the expression of SPWR2, and SPWR2, the conserved dehydroquinate synthase, promotes the accumulation of quinate derivative metabolites that confer SPWR in sweet potato. Generally, our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanism underlying sweet potato-SPW interactions and will aid future efforts to achieve eco-friendly SPW management.

Indexed as

Ipomoea batatasWeevilsAnimals

Identifiers

PMID36376755
OpenAlexW4308994402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.