ReviewBrain informatics2022
A systematic review of the prediction of consumer preference using EEG measures and machine-learning in neuromarketing research.
Review in Brain informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Design-by-Analogy Method for Integrating Chinese Paper-Cutting Art into Product Innovation: Understanding Attractiveness Associations via Expert Evaluations and Eye Tracking.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Eye-Tracking and Forecasting Experiment on Consumer Purchasing Decisions Through Product Reviews.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Understanding the impact of perceived emotional valence of eco-labels for novel food products on consumer preferences, visual attention, and cognition - a multimodal study using EEG and eye tracking.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- EEG feature extraction and machine learning for consumer preference analysis of whisky.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Improving career guidance accuracy through EEG-based vocational interest assessment and self-reported RIASEC profiles.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Editorial: Machine-learning/deep-learning methods in neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Robots as Mental Health Coaches: A Study of Emotional Responses to Technology-Assisted Stress Management Tasks Using Physiological Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A systematic review on EEG-based neuromarketing: recent trends and analyzing techniques.Brain informatics · 2024Review
- Evidence for human-centric in-vehicle lighting: part 3-Illumination preferences based on subjective ratings, eye-tracking behavior, and EEG features.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe present paper discusses the findings of a systematic review of EEG measures in neuromarketing, identifying which EEG measures are the most robust predictor of customer preference in neuromarketing. The review investigated which TF effect (e.g., theta-band power), and ERP component (e.g., N400) was most consistently reflective of self-reported preference. Machine-learning prediction also investigated, along with the use of EEG when combined with physiological measures such as eye-tracking.
methodsSearch terms 'neuromarketing' and 'consumer neuroscience' identified papers that used EEG measures. Publications were excluded if they were primarily written in a language other than English or were not published as journal articles (e.g., book chapters). 174 papers were included in the present review.
resultsFrontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) was the most reliable TF signal of preference and was able to differentiate positive from negative consumer responses. Similarly, the late positive potential (LPP) was the most reliable ERP component, reflecting conscious emotional evaluation of products and advertising. However, there was limited consistency across papers, with each measure showing mixed results when related to preference and purchase behaviour. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: FAA and the LPP were the most consistent markers of emotional responses to marketing stimuli, consumer preference and purchase intention. Predictive accuracy of FAA and the LPP was greatly improved through the use of machine-learning prediction, especially when combined with eye-tracking or facial expression analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.