ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023
A Long-Term Comparative Study Between One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary and Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and GRADE-Based IFSO Position Statement.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the Landscape of Marginal Ulcers After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Incidence, Regional Trends, and Treatment Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- OAGB 2025. A systematic review with meta-analysis of indications and results for primary procedures at 5+ years.Updates in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Seven-Year Comparative Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Weight Recurrence Regain Post Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Individuals with Class 2-3 and Class 4 Obesity : A Retrospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Five-Year Endoscopic Outcomes After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Multicenter Cohort with Bile Reflux, Marginal Ulcers, and Symptom Correlation.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and the Risk of De Novo or Persistent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Serum Zinc Levels.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Evolution Over the Past Decades (2009-2024): Insights from the Iranian National Obesity Surgery Database (INOSD).Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Role of sleeve gastrectomy in improving metabolic syndrome: an overview.Updates in surgery · 2025Review
- Four-Year Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Children and Adolescents with Obesity: Safety, Effectiveness, and Resolution of Obesity-Related Medical Conditions.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Short-Term Assessment of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) Changes Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Patients with Obesity: A Prospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease and the phantom of Barrett's esophagus after most-often-used bariatric procedures: are future investigations necessary?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025Review
- Long-Term Weight Loss Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Assessment of 1971 Patients with 5-9-Year Follow-Up.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Technical Considerations in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-the Israeli Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Experience.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Banded One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (BOAGB) for Patients Living with Obesity and Extreme Obesity: A Single Institution's Experience.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become increasingly accepted in bariatric surgery and meanwhile represents the third most common procedure worldwide. While it shows promising weight loss results and comorbidity resolution, questions about issues such as reflux or nutritional deficiencies (ND) persist in the long term. On the other hand, the most frequently performed sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has to accept growing criticism regarding long-term results and reflux issues. There is a particular lack of long-term comparative data for both procedures. This study presents our long-term experience.
methodsWe evaluated OAGB and SG patients retrospectively comparing for weight loss and resolution of comorbidities as well as perioperative and long-term complications in a follow-up period of 5 years.
resultsNine hundred eleven OAGB and 241 SG were included in the study. OAGB had a shorter operation time and hospital stay. Overall complication rate did not differ in both groups. Ulcers were more frequent in OAGB (7.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.001), whereas insufficient weight loss (IWL)/weight regain (WR) proved to be more prevalent in SG (25.7% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001). The same held true for reflux (17.8% vs. 8.3%, p < .001). On the other hand, ND were more common in OAGB (20.0% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.005). Revisional surgery was more often indicated after SG. Analysis by linear mixed model showed that OAGB achieved a lower BMI/higher loss of BMI. Improvement of T2DM (94.6% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.008) and sleep apnea (88.8% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.01) was superior in OAGB.
conclusionsOAGB had a superior effect on weight loss as well as improvement of T2DM and sleep apnea. Furthermore, long-term problems such as IWL/WR and reflux were more related to SG. On the other hand, a malabsorptive procedure such as OAGB showed a higher risk for ND. Our findings support the available data in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.