Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36376637›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Barriers to Adoption of a Secure Text Messaging System: a Qualitative Study of Practicing Clinicians.

Thomas F Byrd, Philip S Speigel, Kenzie A Cameron, Kevin J O'Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas F ByrdDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, MMC 741, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. byrd0134@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6430-9419
Philip S SpeigelDivision of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kenzie A CameronDivision of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kevin J O'LearyDivision of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecure text messaging systems (STMS) offer HIPAA-compliant text messaging and mobile phone call functionalities that are more efficient than traditional paging. Although some studies associate improved provider satisfaction and healthcare delivery with STMS use, healthcare organizations continue to struggle with achieving widespread and sustained STMS adoption.

objectiveTo understand the barriers to adoption of an STMS among physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs).

designWe qualitatively analyzed free-text comments that clinicians (physicians and APPs) across a large healthcare organization offered on a survey about STMS perceptions.

participantsA total of 1110 clinicians who provided a free-text comment in response to one of four open-ended survey questions. APPROACH: Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach and constant comparative method to characterize responses and identify themes. KEY

resultsThe overall survey response rate was 20.5% (n = 1254). Clinicians familiar with the STMS frequently believed the STMS was unnecessary (existing tools worked well enough) and would overburden them with more communications. They were frustrated that the STMS app had to be downloaded onto their personal mobile device and that it drained their battery. Ambiguity regarding who was reachable in the app led to missed messages and drove distrust of the STMS. Clinicians saw the exclusion of other care team members (e.g., nurses) from the STMS as problematic; however, some clinicians at hospitals with expanded STMS access complained of excessive messages. Secondhand reports of several of these barriers prevented new users from downloading the app and contributed to ongoing low use.

conclusionsClinicians are reluctant to adopt an STMS that does not offer a clear and trustworthy communication benefit to offset its potential burden and intrusiveness. Our findings can be incorporated into STMS implementation strategies that maximize active users by targeting and mitigating barriers to adoption.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneText MessagingCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchHospital communication systemsImplementation scienceMobile applicationsPatient care teamText messaging

Identifiers

PMID36376637
PMCPMC10110803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.