Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36376556›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023

Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in people with non-specific chronic low back pain-a cross-sectional test-retest reliability study.

Anıl Özüdoğru, Mehmet Canlı, İsmail Ceylan, Şafak Kuzu, Halil Alkan, Başak Çiğdem Karaçay

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05986370 (The METRIC Study Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05986370 narecruitingnot on this map

The METRIC Study Protocol: an Explanatory Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying the Therapeutic Effects of Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresRan2023 to 2026Enrolled112ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmslumbar spinal manipulative therapy, sham spinal manipulative therapy, full spine spinal manipulative therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The reliability and validity of the 30-second chair sit-to-stand test and the five-repetition sit-to-stand test in individuals following lumbar spinal surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex-based differences in biomechanical function for chronic low back pain and how it relates to pain experience.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Estimating the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with lumbar disc herniation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anıl ÖzüdoğruSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Kirşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-9863
Mehmet CanlıSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Kirşehir, Turkey. canlimehmet600@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-9599
İsmail CeylanSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Kirşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-0243
Şafak KuzuSchool of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Kirşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-3565
Halil AlkanFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muş Alparslan University, Muş, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-2495
Başak Çiğdem KaraçayFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ahi Evran University, Kirşehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-5450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

aimThe Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) is a method that evaluates lower extremity muscle strength and balance level. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the FTSST in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) whose lower extremity muscle strength and balance levels are adversely affected.

methodsThe first outcome measure of the study was the FTSST, which was conducted by two different researchers. Secondary outcome measures are Biodex Balance System (BBS), Quadriceps Muscle Strength Test, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used for the validity and reliability of the FTSST, which was made by two different researchers, and Pearson's Correlation Analysis was used to determine its relationship with other measurements.

resultsInter-rater and test-retest reliability for the FTSST were excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.99). A statistically significant correlation was found between all secondary outcome measures (BBS, quadriceps muscle strength, ODI, VAS) and FTSST (p < 0.05).

conclusionIn line with the findings of our study, we think that FTSST is a simple, easy, and reproducible method for evaluating lower extremity muscle strength, balance level, functional status, and pain in patients with NSCLBP.

Indexed as

Low Back PainCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationHumansLower ExtremityMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsFive times Sit-to-Stand TestNon-specific chronic low back painReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.