SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
General anaesthetic vs local anaesthetic myringoplasties: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess all available data and determine the success rates and tolerability of local anaesthetic myringoplasty in comparison with those undertaken under general anaesthetic myringoplasty. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was designed following a PRISMA-P protocol and registered with the PROSPERO database. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (CDSR/Central), EMBASE and CINHAL-were directly searched for studies, which met the inclusion criteria.
objectivesPrimary objective was to compare perforation closure rates between patients undergoing myringoplasty under local anaesthetic and those under general anaesthetic from all available published data. Secondary outcomes include complications, such as 'any minor complications', infection rates in the first 6 month post-op, facial nerve weakness, dysgeusia and patient satisfaction.
results27 studies were included in the final analysis and found that myringoplasty had an overall perforation closure rate of 89%. The pooled proportion of closures after myringoplasty under local anesthesia was 87% and for myringoplasties under general anesthesia was 91%. Analysis of myringoplasty under local anaesthesia focusing on 'in-office' performed procedures only, found a closure rate of 88%.
conclusionsThere is no significant difference in the success rate of myringoplasty surgery when performed under local or general anaesthetic as measured by perforation closure rates. However, there are other factors, which can drive choosing local anaesthetic surgery, such as minimising anaesthetic risks, reducing costs and reducing environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.