ArticleScientific reports2022
Vasectomy reversal outcomes in men after testosterone therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Testosterone therapy at the time of vasectomy reversal Impact on intraoperative decision-making and interpretation of postoperative outcomes.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Reassessing Semen Analysis: Clinical Insights Beyond Sperm Count and Motility.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of males on testosterone therapy (TT) seeking vasectomy reversal (VR) is rising. As medical therapy (MT) to recover spermatogenesis after TT has been previously described, our study's objective is to present our institution's management and outcomes of VR in men previously on TT. We performed a retrospective case series of vasectomy patients on TT with subsequent VR by a single microsurgeon between March, 2010 and March, 2022. 14 men undergoing VR during the study period met inclusion criteria. The median age at VR was 43 years with a median obstructive interval of 11 years. Median time from MT to VR was 5 months. Post-operative semen analysis was performed in 10 men and all demonstrated patency. 2 patients had very low sperm counts secondary to continuing TT following VR contrary to medical advice and 5 men with patency achieved pregnancy. Our study noted a high rate of vasovasostomy (VV) (96%) and sustained patency despite a 12-year median obstructive interval. Our findings support favorable outcomes with less stringent VV indications after MT in patients previously on TT that desire VR. The use of MT reduces the recommended wait times for VR after TT discontinuation by more than half.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.