Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36376506›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2023

The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care.

Neel Shah, Ahmed Arshad, Monty B Mazer, Christopher L Carroll, Steven L Shein, Kenneth E Remy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pediatric Oncology Hospice: A Comprehensive Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neel ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. Neel.Shah@Wustl.edu.
Ahmed ArshadDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, OK, USA.
Monty B MazerDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christopher L CarrollDepartment of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Steven L SheinDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kenneth E RemyDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of pediatric critical care has been hampered in the era of precision medicine by our inability to accurately define and subclassify disease phenotypes. This has been caused by heterogeneity across age groups that further challenges the ability to perform randomized controlled trials in pediatrics. One approach to overcome these inherent challenges include the use of machine learning algorithms that can assist in generating more meaningful interpretations from clinical data. This review summarizes machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques that are currently in use for clinical data modeling with relevance to pediatric critical care. Focus has been placed on the differences between techniques and the role of each in the clinical arena. The various forms of clinical decision support that utilize machine learning are also described. We review the applications and limitations of machine learning techniques to empower clinicians to make informed decisions at the bedside. IMPACT: Critical care units generate large amounts of under-utilized data that can be processed through artificial intelligence. This review summarizes the machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques currently being used to process clinical data. The review highlights the applications and limitations of these techniques within a clinical context to aid providers in making more informed decisions at the bedside.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsChildCritical CareHumansPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID36376506
PMCPMC9660024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.