ArticleScientific data2022
Enabling FAIR data in Earth and environmental science with community-centric (meta)data reporting formats.
Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- From smart sensing to adaptive remediation: artificial intelligence and Internet of Things for persistent organic pollutants.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Review
- AI-assisted, human-in-the-loop pipeline for converting historical documents into structured database: a feasibility study of environmental application in Michigan.Evidence-based toxicology · 2026Article
- Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches in Environmental Biotechnology: A Review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Review
- From toxicogenomics to predictive toxicology and exposomics: defining the next decade of gene-environment research.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Coordinating collaborative infectious disease modeling projects with the hubverse.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- More efficient reproducible research in hydrology: moving research down the academic career scale (MRDTACS).Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- Opening doors to physical sample tracking and attribution in Earth and environmental sciences.Scientific data · 2025Article
- FAIR-Compliant Database for Soil Erosion Studies: The Marganai Forest Experiment.Scientific data · 2025Article
- The challenges of research data management in cardiovascular science: a DGK and DZHK position paper-executive summary.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Review
- Ten simple rules for starting FAIR discussions in your community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Biogeochemistry of upland to wetland soils, sediments, and surface waters across Mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes coastal interfaces.Scientific data · 2023Article
- The EPOS multi-disciplinary Data Portal for integrated access to solid Earth science datasets.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Enabling FAIR data in Earth and environmental science with community-centric (meta)data reporting formats.Scientific data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research can be more transparent and collaborative by using Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles to publish Earth and environmental science data. Reporting formats-instructions, templates, and tools for consistently formatting data within a discipline-can help make data more accessible and reusable. However, the immense diversity of data types across Earth science disciplines makes development and adoption challenging. Here, we describe 11 community reporting formats for a diverse set of Earth science (meta)data including cross-domain metadata (dataset metadata, location metadata, sample metadata), file-formatting guidelines (file-level metadata, CSV files, terrestrial model data archiving), and domain-specific reporting formats for some biological, geochemical, and hydrological data (amplicon abundance tables, leaf-level gas exchange, soil respiration, water and sediment chemistry, sensor-based hydrologic measurements). More broadly, we provide guidelines that communities can use to create new (meta)data formats that integrate with their scientific workflows. Such reporting formats have the potential to accelerate scientific discovery and predictions by making it easier for data contributors to provide (meta)data that are more interoperable and reusable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.