Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36376079›Full record

SynthesisCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2023

A Systematic Review of Optogenetic Vision Restoration: History, Challenges, and New Inventions from Bench to Bedside.

Antonia Stefanov, John G Flannery

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Optogenetic vision restoration in the face of secondary and tertiary remodeling in the rd1 mouse retina.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Overview of Retinal Gene Therapy: Current Status and Future Challenges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonia StefanovHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
John G FlanneryHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA flannery@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blindness due to rod-cone dystrophies is a significant comorbidity and cause of reduced quality of life worldwide. Optogenetics uses adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors to bypass lost photoreceptors and transfect remnant cell populations of the degenerated retina aiming to restore vision via the ectopic expression of opsins. The optogenetic targeting of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) has been remarkably successful and several studies have advanced to clinical trials over the recent years. The inner retina and specifically ON bipolar cells represent even more appealing targets due to their intrinsically coded tasks in parallel processing and fine-tuning of visual signals before reaching the output: RGCs. However, present success with pursuing inner and outer retinal cells for optogenetic vision restoration is limited by multiple factors, including AAV tropism, promoter specificity, and retinal morphofunctional remodeling. Here we provide a review of the evolution of optogenetics, its greatest challenges, and solutions from bench to bedside.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsRetinal DegenerationHumansInventionsQuality of LifeRetinaRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID36376079
PMCPMC10234433
OpenAlexW4308992255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.