ArticleEnvironmental research2023
Measurement error correction for ambient PM
Article in Environmental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of comorbidities in the associations between air pollution and Alzheimer's disease: A national cohort study in the American Medicare population.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Air pollution predicts healthcare spending among older adults in the United States.Environment international · 2026Article
- Exposure measurement error in air-pollution epidemiology and its determinants: results from the MELONS study.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Causal Concentration-Response Modeling with Continuous Curves and Exposure Error Correction:Environmental health perspectives · 2025Article
- Ambient fine particulate matter and daily mortality: a comparative analysis of observed and estimated exposure in 347 cities.International journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Nationwide estimation of daily ambient PMPNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Exposure-response associations between chronic exposure to fine particulate matter and risks of hospital admission for major cardiovascular diseases: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies on the impact of measurement error for PM
methodsThe "gold-standard" measurements of PM
resultsAcross 208 strata, the median of β
conclusionsRegression calibration parameters of PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.