ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2022
Rapid, Low-Complexity, Simultaneous Bacterial Group Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Performed Directly on Positive Blood Culture Bottles Using Chromogenic Agar.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A One-Health Perspective onEnvironmental health insights · 2026Review
- Evaluation of three protocols for direct susceptibility testing for Gram-negative rods from flagged positive blood culture bottles.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of positive blood culture bottles for direct disk diffusion susceptibility testing (dDD), together with chromogenic culture limited to groups of pathogens for antimicrobial susceptibility testing interpretation may provide a means for laboratories-in-development to introduce rapid abbreviated blood culture testing. We assessed the performance of dDD on Chromatic MH agar using contrived positive blood culture bottles and compared findings with current standard practice. Furthermore, we characterized the growth of 24 bacterial and 3 yeast species on Chromatic MH agar with the aid of rapid spot tests for same-day identification. The coefficient of variation for reproducibility of dDD of four reference strains in 4 to 10 replicates (238 data points) ranged from 0% to 16.3%. Together with an additional 10 challenge isolates, the overall categorical agreement was 91.7% (351 data points). The following bacteria were readily identifiable: cream/white Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococcus pyogenes; turquoise Streptococcus agalactiae, enterococci, Listeria monocytogenes; mauve Escherichia coli, Shigella sonnei, Citrobacter freundii; dark-blue Klebsiella and Enterobacter; green Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and brown Proteus. Clear colonies were seen with Salmonella, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, and Yersinia enterocolitica (turns pink). Our study suggests that Chromatic MH for dDD may show promise as a rapid, clinically useful presumptive method for overnight simultaneous identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. However, there is a need to optimize the medium formulation to allow the recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.