Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36375407›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of disease2022

Genuine high-order interactions in brain networks and neurodegeneration.

Rubén Herzog, Fernando E Rosas, Robert Whelan, Sol Fittipaldi, Hernando Santamaria-Garcia, Josephine Cruzat, Agustina Birba, Sebastian Moguilner, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Pavel Prado and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic utility of electrophysiological markers for early and differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's, Frontotemporal, and Lewy Body dementias: A systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Creative experiences and brain clocks.Nature communications · 2025
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Rubén HerzogLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Fundación para el Estudio de la Conciencia Humana (EcoH), Chile.
Fernando E RosasFundación para el Estudio de la Conciencia Humana (EcoH), Chile; Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK; Data Science Institute, Imperial College London, UK; Centre for Complexity Science, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Robert WhelanGlobal Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Sol FittipaldiLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés & CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hernando Santamaria-GarciaLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Josephine CruzatLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Fundación para el Estudio de la Conciencia Humana (EcoH), Chile.
Agustina BirbaCognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés & CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sebastian MoguilnerLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Enzo TagliazucchiLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Buenos Aires Physics Institute and Physics Department, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pavel PradoLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: pavel.prado@uai.cl.
Agustin IbanezLatin American Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés & CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco (UCSF), CA, USA. Electronic address: agustin.ibanez@gbhi.org.
Adolfo Ibáñez University · CLConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of San Andrés · ARUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

US-South American Initiative for Genetic-Neural-Behavioral Interactions in Human Neurodegenerative ResearchR01AG057234 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Agustin M. Ibanez · 2019 to 2026
$6.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain functional networks have been traditionally studied considering only interactions between pairs of regions, neglecting the richer information encoded in higher orders of interactions. In consequence, most of the connectivity studies in neurodegeneration and dementia use standard pairwise metrics. Here, we developed a genuine high-order functional connectivity (HOFC) approach that captures interactions between 3 or more regions across spatiotemporal scales, delivering a more biologically plausible characterization of the pathophysiology of neurodegeneration. We applied HOFC to multimodal (electroencephalography [EEG], and functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]) data from patients diagnosed with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and healthy controls. HOFC revealed large effect sizes, which, in comparison to standard pairwise metrics, provided a more accurate and parsimonious characterization of neurodegeneration. The multimodal characterization of neurodegeneration revealed hypo and hyperconnectivity on medium to large-scale brain networks, with a larger contribution of the former. Regions as the amygdala, the insula, and frontal gyrus were associated with both effects, suggesting potential compensatory processes in hub regions. fMRI revealed hypoconnectivity in AD between regions of the default mode, salience, visual, and auditory networks, while in bvFTD between regions of the default mode, salience, and somatomotor networks. EEG revealed hypoconnectivity in the γ band between frontal, limbic, and sensory regions in AD, and in the δ band between frontal, temporal, parietal and posterior areas in bvFTD, suggesting additional pathophysiological processes that fMRI alone can not capture. Classification accuracy was comparable with standard biomarkers and robust against confounders such as sample size, age, education, and motor artifacts (from fMRI and EEG). We conclude that high-order interactions provide a detailed, EEG- and fMRI compatible, biologically plausible, and psychopathological-specific characterization of different neurodegenerative conditions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseFrontotemporal DementiaBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkersHigh-order interactionsMachine learningNeural networksNeurodegenerationNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID36375407
PMCPMC11195446
OpenAlexW4309662767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.