Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36375037›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2023

The Asia-Pacific AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter consensus statement.

Eric Chung, Limin Liao, Jang Hwan Kim, Zhong Wang, Takeya Kitta, Alex Tong-Long Lin, Kyu-Sung Lee, Liefu Ye, Peggy Chu, Yasuhiro Kaiho and 5 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the UK: are we following the guidelines?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Eric ChungDepartment of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3373-3668
Limin LiaoDepartment of Urology, China Rehabilitation Research Centre and Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jang Hwan KimDepartment of Urology and Urological Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Zhong WangDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ninth Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Takeya KittaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-9225
Alex Tong-Long LinDepartment of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kyu-Sung LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Liefu YeDepartment of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Peggy ChuDepartment of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yasuhiro KaihoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Mineo TakeiDepartment of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hai JiangDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Joe LeeDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Hitoshi MasudaDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Vincent TseDepartment of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Boston Scientific Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Asia-Pacific (AP) AMS 800™ artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) consensus statement aims to provide a set of practical recommendations to assist surgeons with the AMS 800 device surgery. The AP consensus committee consisted of key opinion leaders with extensive experience with AMS 800 surgery across several AP countries. The panel reviewed and discussed relevant findings with emphasis on locoregional and specific clinical challenges relevant to the AP region. Recommendations were made in key areas namely (1) patient selection and informed consent process; (2) preoperative assessment; (3) dealing with co-existing urological disorders; (4) surgical principles and intraoperative troubleshooting; (5) postoperative care; (6) special populations; and (7) cost analysis and comparative review. The AMS 800 device should be offered to males with moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Full informed consent should be undertaken, and emphasis is placed on surgical contraindications and high-risk candidates. The presence of a surgical mentor or referral to experts is recommended in complex AUS candidates. Preoperative cystoscopy with or without multichannel urodynamic study is necessary and patients with pre-existing urological disorders should be treated adequately and clinically stable before surgery. Adherence to strict patient selection and safe surgical principles are critical to ensure excellent clinical outcomes and minimize complications. Given that InhibiZone-coated device is not available in many AP countries, the use of prophylactic antibiotics pre-and post-operatively are recommended. The AMS 800 device should be prepared according to the manufacturer's guidelines and remains a cost-effective treatment for male SUI. The AMS 800 device remains the surgical benchmark for male SUI but is associated with certain mechanical limitations and a unique set of complications.

Indexed as

Urinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialAsiaHumansMalePostoperative CareTreatment Outcomeartificial urinary sphincterassessmentcomplicationsspecial populationsurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID36375037
PMCPMC10100264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.