ReviewInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2023
The Asia-Pacific AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter consensus statement.
Review in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing and Cost Consideration in Surgery for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence For Current Urology Reports.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Early Outcomes After Discontinuing Routine Gentamicin Irrigation During AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: A Single-Centre Retrospective Before-After Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the UK: are we following the guidelines?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Urinary Sphincters: History, Current Utilization, and Future Innovations.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Prevalence and risk factors for overactive bladder symptoms in patients with artificial urinary sphincter.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The male slings: an effective and safe alternative surgical treatment to the artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence?-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Surgical strategies in artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery: troubleshooting the complications.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Narrative review: evolution in device technology and advances in surgical techniques on AMS 800 device in the last 50 years.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- A narrative review on synchronous concurrent versus delayed sequential surgery in the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis implantation.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Rigicon ContiClassic and ContiReflex artificial urinary sphincter devices.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Current Surgical Treatment for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This Asia-Pacific (AP) AMS 800™ artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) consensus statement aims to provide a set of practical recommendations to assist surgeons with the AMS 800 device surgery. The AP consensus committee consisted of key opinion leaders with extensive experience with AMS 800 surgery across several AP countries. The panel reviewed and discussed relevant findings with emphasis on locoregional and specific clinical challenges relevant to the AP region. Recommendations were made in key areas namely (1) patient selection and informed consent process; (2) preoperative assessment; (3) dealing with co-existing urological disorders; (4) surgical principles and intraoperative troubleshooting; (5) postoperative care; (6) special populations; and (7) cost analysis and comparative review. The AMS 800 device should be offered to males with moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Full informed consent should be undertaken, and emphasis is placed on surgical contraindications and high-risk candidates. The presence of a surgical mentor or referral to experts is recommended in complex AUS candidates. Preoperative cystoscopy with or without multichannel urodynamic study is necessary and patients with pre-existing urological disorders should be treated adequately and clinically stable before surgery. Adherence to strict patient selection and safe surgical principles are critical to ensure excellent clinical outcomes and minimize complications. Given that InhibiZone-coated device is not available in many AP countries, the use of prophylactic antibiotics pre-and post-operatively are recommended. The AMS 800 device should be prepared according to the manufacturer's guidelines and remains a cost-effective treatment for male SUI. The AMS 800 device remains the surgical benchmark for male SUI but is associated with certain mechanical limitations and a unique set of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.