ArticlePloS one2022
Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06895239 (Elbow Arthroplasty and Patient Reported Post-operative Activities), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Elbow Arthroplasty and Patient Reported Post-operative Activities
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The most influential articles in total elbow arthroplasty: bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Total elbow arthroplasty-a historical review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Current outcomes of triceps-sparing elbow arthroplasties: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Surgical Fixation of Distal Humeral Nonunion in an Elderly Patient Three Years After Injury: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Difference in daily tasks execution and elbow joint load: a comparison between patients after total elbow arthroplasty and healthy controls.JSES international · 2025Article
- Analyzing Declining Trends, Patient Demographics, and Complications in Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Nationwide Retrospective Data Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Postoperative Weightlifting Restrictions Following Elbow Arthroplasty: A Survey of Italian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Members.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Is popularity of total elbow arthroplasty in the United States decreasing? An analysis of trends, demographics, and indications.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of complications after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is high and survival rates are low compared to hip and knee arthroplasties. The most common reason for revision is aseptic loosening, which might be caused by overloading of the elbow. In an attempt to lower failure rates, current clinical practice is to restrict activities for patients with a TEA. However, postoperative management of TEA is a poorly investigated topic, as no evidence-based clinical guidelines exist and the aftercare is often surgeon-based. In this study we evaluated the current postoperative management of TEA among orthopedic surgeons.
methodsAn online survey of 30 questions was sent to 635 members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow (SECEC/ESSSE), about 10% (n = ± 64) of whom are considered dedicated elbow specialists. The questions were on characteristics of the surgeon and on the surgeon's preferred postoperative management, including items to be assessed on length of immobilization, amount of weight bearing and axial loading, instructions on lifelong activities, physiotherapy, and postoperative evaluation of the elbow.
resultsThe survey was completed by 54 dedicated elbow specialists from 17 different countries. Postoperative immobilization of the elbow was advised by half of respondents when using the triceps-sparing approach (52%), and even more with the triceps-detaching approach (65%). Postoperative passive movement of the elbow was allowed in the triceps-sparing approach (91%) and in the triceps-detaching approach (87%). Most respondents gave recommendations on weight bearing (91%) or axial loading (76%) by the affected elbow, but the specification shows significant variation.
conclusionThe results from this survey demonstrate a wide variation in postoperative care of TEA. The lack of consensus in combination with low survival rates stresses the need for clinical guidelines. Further research should focus on creating these guidelines to improve follow-up care for TEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.