Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36374436›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Remotely delivered exercise to older rural cancer survivors: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Nancy M Gell, Kim Dittus, Jacqueline Caefer, Anita Martin, Myeongjin Bae, Kushang V Patel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07032584 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Multimodal Telerehabilitation on Reducing Disparities in Rural Survivors of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2029Enrolled74ConditionsProstate Cancer, Metastatic Prostate Cancer, Androgen Deprivation TherapyArmsTelerehabilitation Intervention
NCT07093177 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Telerehabilitation of Rural Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2026 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsProstate CancerArmsTelerehabilitation Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Community readiness and feasibility of the Exercising TogetherJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of a community-based remotely delivered exercise program (2Unstoppable Strong) for women diagnosed with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nancy M GellDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 306B Rowell 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA. nancy.gell@med.uvm.edu.
Kim DittusUniversity of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Jacqueline CaeferDepartment of Physical Therapy Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Anita MartinDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 306B Rowell 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Myeongjin BaeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 306B Rowell 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Kushang V PatelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Funding

Randomized controlled trial evaluating an innovative community-based intervention combining group-based exercise and behavioral health skills-training for older adults with painful knee osteoarthritisR01AG060992 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PATEL, KUSHANG · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aimed to determine the feasibility of remotely delivered exercise (tele-exercise) for older, rural cancer survivors and to explore the effects of tele-exercise on physical function, physical activity, and patient-reported outcomes.

methodsParticipants were rural cancer survivors age

resultsAmong those screened as eligible, 44 (64%) consented to participate with 39 randomized after completing baseline measures. Attrition was equivalent between groups (n = 1, each) with 95% completing the study. The median class attendance rate was 86.9% (interquartile range: 79-94%). Compared to controls, tele-EF participants had statistically significant improvement in the five-time sit-to-stand test (- 3.4 vs. - 1.1 s, p = 0.03, effect size = 0.44), mean daily light physical activity (+ 38.5 vs 0.5 min, p = 0.03, effect size = 0.72) and step counts (+ 1977 vs. 33, p = 0.01, effect size = 0.96). There were no changes in self-efficacy for exercise, fatigue, or sleep disturbance between groups.

conclusionsFindings indicate that tele-EF is feasible in older, rural cancer survivors and results in positive changes in physical function and physical activity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Tele-EF addresses common barriers to exercise for older, rural cancer survivors, including limited accessible opportunities for professional instruction and supervision.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAgedExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeCancerEnhanceFitnessOlder adultsPhysical functionTele-exercise

Identifiers

PMID36374436
PMCPMC9662104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.