Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36374413›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Mouse Models of Renal Allograft Transplant Rejection: Methods to Investigate Chemokine-GAG Interaction and Therapeutic Blockade.

Isabela R Zanetti, Liqiang Zhang, Michelle Burgin, Jacquelyn Kilbourne, Jordan R Yaron, David Fonseca, Alexandra R Lucas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabela R ZanettiCenter for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Liqiang ZhangCenter for Immunotherapy Vaccines and Virotherapy and Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Michelle BurginCenter for Immunotherapy Vaccines and Virotherapy and Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Jacquelyn KilbourneDepartment of Animal Care and Technologies, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Jordan R YaronCenter for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute and School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
David FonsecaCenter for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Alexandra R LucasCenter for Personalized Diagnostics and Center for Immunotherapy Vaccines and Virotherapy, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. alexluc1@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemokine-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) interactions direct immune cell activation and invasion, e.g., directing immune cells to sites of infection or injury, and are central to initiating immune responses. Acute innate and also adaptive or antibody-mediated immune cell responses both drive damage to kidney transplants. These immune responses are central to allograft rejection and transplant failure. While treatment for acute rejection has advanced greatly, ongoing or chronic immune damage from inflammation and antibody-mediated rejection remains a significant problem, leading to transplant loss. There are limited numbers of organs available for transplant, and preventing chronic graft damage will allow for longer graft stability and function, reducing the need for repeat transplantation. Chemokine-GAG interactions are the basis for initial immune responses, forming directional gradients that allow immune cells to traverse the vascular endothelium and enter engrafted organs. Targeting chemokine-GAG interactions thus has the potential to reduce immune damage to transplanted kidneys.Mouse models for renal transplant are available, but are complex and require extensive microsurgery expertise. Here we describe simplified subcapsular and subcutaneous renal allograft transplant models, for rapid assessment of the roles of chemokine-GAG interactions during allograft surgery and rejection. These models are described, together with treatment using a unique chemokine modulating protein (CMP) M-T7 that disrupts chemokine-GAG interactions.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAllograftsAnimalsChemokinesDisease Models, AnimalGlycosaminoglycansGraft RejectionMicePostoperative ComplicationsChemokinesGlycosaminoglycansChemokineChemokine modulating proteinGlycosaminoglycan (GAG)M-T7RejectionRenal allograftSubcapsularSubcutaneousTransplant

Identifiers

PMID36374413
OpenAlexW4308970287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.