Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36374312›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

VisuMax Flap 2.0: a flap plus technique to reduce incidence of an opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Zichen Wang, Xinliang Cheng, Xueying Lou, Hongliang Chen, Zhifeng Lu, Hui Chen, Ying Yu

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zichen Wang *Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-7045
Xinliang Cheng *Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Xueying LouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Hongliang ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Zhifeng LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Hui ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Ying YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China. yuying.2009@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-972X
Nantong University · CN

Funding

Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China 2019M651927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the incidence of an opaque bubble layer (OBL) in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) flaps created with VisuMax Flap 2.0 as a result of a modification in the parameters of the flap programming.

methodsThis retrospective study was comprised of 1400 eyes of 715 patients who received FS-LASIK surgery. OBLs were measured and reported as a percentage of the flap area to identify the incidence and extent. Flap creation, which is a modification technique, was performed with 8.1-mm flap diameters plus 0.3-mm enlarged interlamellar photodisruption (group Flap 2.0). The same flap diameters without extra photodisruption as the previous standard setting were also implemented (group Flap 1.0). The preoperative measurements, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, and intraoperative characteristics such as flap size and thickness, were documented. Possible risk factors for the occurrence of OBLs were investigated in this study.

resultsThe incidence of an OBL was reduced when using the Flap 2.0 program (31.4%) compared to the Flap 1.0 program (63.7%). The area of hard and soft OBLs created by the Flap 2.0 program is smaller than those created by the Flap 1.0 program (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a thinner flap (P = 0.038) and a higher sphere (P = 0.001) affected the chance of hard OBLs occurring.

conclusionThe VisuMax Flap 2.0 program promotes gas venting by enlarging the interlamellar photodisruption size. The incidence and extent of OBLs appear to be reduced significantly when the Flap 2.0 program is applied.

Indexed as

Keratomileusis, Laser In SituMyopiaCorneal PachymetryCorneal StromaHumansIncidenceLasers, ExcimerRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityFemtosecond laserFlapLASIKOpaque bubble layer

Identifiers

PMID36374312
PMCPMC10049947
OpenAlexW4308954522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read45
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.