ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023
Development and external validation of automated detection, classification, and localization of ankle fractures: inside the black box of a convolutional neural network (CNN).
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- FAD-MIL: a weakly supervised fracture detection model based on X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Observational
- Deep Learning Enhances Weightbearing CT Detection of Lisfranc Instability: A FIXUS-AI Ankle Insight 3D Algorithm.Cureus · 2025Article
- An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Radiological Imaging for Bone Fracture Diagnosis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bone Fracture Detection: A Review of Evidence, Limitations, and Clinical Integration.Cureus · 2025Review
- Cross-validation of an artificial intelligence tool for fracture classification and localization on conventional radiography in Dutch population.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Automated radiography assessment of ankle joint instability using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Faster R-CNN model for target recognition and diagnosis of scapular fractures.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Article
- Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.Current medical science · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- External validation of an artificial intelligence multi-label deep learning model capable of ankle fracture classification.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Observational
- Harnessing ResNet50 and SENet for enhanced ankle fracture identification.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery: current concepts.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Detection and localization of caries and hypomineralization on dental photographs with a vision transformer model.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) are increasingly being developed for automated fracture detection in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Studies to date, however, are limited to providing classification based on the entire image-and only produce heatmaps for approximate fracture localization instead of delineating exact fracture morphology. Therefore, we aimed to answer (1) what is the performance of a CNN that detects, classifies, localizes, and segments an ankle fracture, and (2) would this be externally valid?
methodsThe training set included 326 isolated fibula fractures and 423 non-fracture radiographs. The Detectron2 implementation of the Mask R-CNN was trained with labelled and annotated radiographs. The internal validation (or 'test set') and external validation sets consisted of 300 and 334 radiographs, respectively. Consensus agreement between three experienced fellowship-trained trauma surgeons was defined as the ground truth label. Diagnostic accuracy and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess classification performance. The Intersection over Union (IoU) was used to quantify accuracy of the segmentation predictions by the CNN, where a value of 0.5 is generally considered an adequate segmentation.
resultsThe final CNN was able to classify fibula fractures according to four classes (Danis-Weber A, B, C and No Fracture) with AUC values ranging from 0.93 to 0.99. Diagnostic accuracy was 89% on the test set with average sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 96%. External validity was 89-90% accurate on a set of radiographs from a different hospital. Accuracies/AUCs observed were 100/0.99 for the 'No Fracture' class, 92/0.99 for 'Weber B', 88/0.93 for 'Weber C', and 76/0.97 for 'Weber A'. For the fracture bounding box prediction by the CNN, a mean IoU of 0.65 (SD ± 0.16) was observed. The fracture segmentation predictions by the CNN resulted in a mean IoU of 0.47 (SD ± 0.17).
conclusionsThis study presents a look into the 'black box' of CNNs and represents the first automated delineation (segmentation) of fracture lines on (ankle) radiographs. The AUC values presented in this paper indicate good discriminatory capability of the CNN and substantiate further study of CNNs in detecting and classifying ankle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Diagnostic imaging study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.