Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36374291›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2022

The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ville Ponkilainen, Ilari Kuitunen, Rasmus Liukkonen, Matias Vaajala, Aleksi Reito, Mikko Uimonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. [Long-term outcomes after ankle fracture-Where do we stand?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Adolescence risk factors for meniscus and ligamentous knee injuries in adulthood: A longitudinal study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Knee Health Is a Major Determinant of Mobility Across the Healthspan.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ville PonkilainenDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-4560
Ilari KuitunenUniversity of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-9610
Rasmus LiukkonenTampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2514-3193
Matias VaajalaTampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1294-6173
Aleksi ReitoTampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461
Mikko UimonenDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6609-1345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather epidemiological information on selected musculoskeletal injuries and to provide pooled injury-specific incidence rates.

methodsPubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported incidence rate (or count with population at risk), contained data on adult population, and were written in English language. The number of cases and population at risk were collected, and the pooled incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either a fixed or random effects model.

resultsThe screening of titles yielded 206 articles eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 173 (84%) articles provided sufficient information to be included in the pooled incidence rates. Incidences of fractures were investigated in 154 studies, and the most common fractures in the whole adult population based on the pooled incidence rates were distal radius fractures (212.0, 95% CI 178.1 to 252.4 per 100,000 person-years), finger fractures (117.1, 95% CI 105.3 to 130.2 per 100,000 person-years), and hip fractures (112.9, 95% CI 82.2 to 154.9 per 100,000 person-years). The most common sprains and dislocations were ankle sprains (429.4, 95% CI 243.0 to 759.0 per 100,000 person-years) and first-time patellar dislocations (32.8, 95% CI 21.6 to 49.7 per 100,000 person-years). The most common injuries were anterior cruciate ligament (17.5, 95% CI 6.0 to 50.2 per 100,000 person-years) and Achilles (13.7, 95% CI 9.6 to 19.5 per 100,000 person-years) ruptures.

conclusionThe presented pooled incidence estimates serve as important references in assessing the global economic and social burden of musculoskeletal injuries.Cite this article:

Indexed as

Ankle sprainsanterior cruciate ligament (ACL)Distal radius fracturesEpidemiologyfinger fractureship fracturesInjuriesmusculoskeletal injuriespatellar dislocationsPelvic fracturesPublic healthrupturessprains

Identifiers

PMID36374291
PMCPMC9680199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.