Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36374192›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics & gerontology international2022

Death at home versus other locations in older people receiving physician-led home visits: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.

Takamasa Watanabe, Masato Matsushima, Makoto Kaneko, Takuya Aoki, Yoshifumi Sugiyama, Yasuki Fujinuma

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Geriatric nutritional risk index as the prognostic factor in older patients with fragility hip fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takamasa WatanabeDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato MatsushimaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-9096
Makoto KanekoDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Takuya AokiDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshifumi SugiyamaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuki FujinumaCentre for Family Medicine Development, Japanese Health and Welfare Co-operative Federation, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPMinistry of Health Labour and Welfare · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24590819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Japanese government is promoting physician-led home visits as well as end-of-life care at home. However, the proportion of deaths occurring at home has remained unchanged for the past 20 years.

objectivesTo report the cumulative incidence of deaths at home and to explore the factors associated with deaths at home versus other places, mainly hospitals.

methodsThis was a multicenter prospective cohort study in a primary care setting. We enrolled patients aged ≥65 years who had started to receive regular visits by family physicians from 13 facilities in and around Tokyo between February 1, 2013 and January 31, 2016. Patients were followed-up until January 31, 2017. The primary outcome measures were mortality rate and cumulative incidence of deaths at home.

resultsWe enrolled 762 patients. Of 368 deaths, 133 occurred in the patient's home. The mortality rates at home were 137.6/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval 116.1-163.1). In cumulative incidence function, the longer duration of care at home lowers the likelihood of death at home. Multivariable multinomial logistic models showed that younger age and higher Barthel Index score reduced the likelihood of deaths at home, while receiving oxygen therapy and the presence of a full-time caregiver increased the likelihood of deaths at home relative to deaths at other locations.

conclusionsOf deceased patients, only one-third died in patients' homes. We found several factors associated with deaths at home, which appeared to reflect the readiness of patients and their families for death. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 1005-1012.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesPhysiciansTerminal CareAgedHouse CallsHumansJapanProspective Studiesaging populationdeath at homehome caremortalityprospective study

Identifiers

PMID36374192
PMCPMC10100087
OpenAlexW4308954840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.