ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
The molecular profile of breast cancer: primary tumor versus corresponding lymph node metastases.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BrCa) is the most frequent malignancy in female, and lymph node metastases (LNM) is an important prognostic and therapeutic parameter. The molecular classification is nowadays largely applied to characterize the primary tumors, but few studies focused on the comparison between the molecular profiles of the primary with corresponding LNM. In the current work, we investigated the expression of conventional markers used by molecular classification in both primary tumors and axillary LNM. A series of 156 patients with BrCa was investigated, and from these 80 cases showed LNM. After routine pathological investigation, including the histopathological form and grade, we performed additional step sections from the primary and lymph nodes for immunohistochemistry. All procedures for hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki67, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53, E-cadherin, and B-cell leukemia∕lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) were performed using the standard automated procedures. We found significant differences between the primary tumors and corresponding LNM in luminal A, luminal B, and basal-like carcinoma. No phenotypical interconversions were noticed in HER2 and unclassified BrCa. Our data demonstrate that in almost 20% of the cases the molecular profile of the primary does not overlap with aspects found in the lymph nodes. Our results strongly suggest performing the molecular classification in both primary tumors and in LNM. Current data suggest that the application of this diagnostic procedure will significantly influence the therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.