ArticleMolecular omics2023
Towards inferring absolute concentrations from relative abundance in time-course GC-MS metabolomics data.
Article in Molecular omics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive biomarkers for early oral cancer detection through multiomics approach.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Atomic elementary flux modes explain the steady state flow of metabolites in large-scale flux networks.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolomics, the large-scale study of metabolites, has significant appeal as a source of information for metabolic modeling and other scientific applications. One common approach for measuring metabolomics data is gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). However, GC-MS metabolomics data are typically reported as relative abundances, precluding their use with approaches and tools where absolute concentrations are necessary. While chemical standards can be used to help provide quantification, their use is time-consuming, expensive, or even impossible due to their limited availability. The ability to infer absolute concentrations from GC-MS metabolomics data without chemical standards would have significant value. We hypothesized that when analyzing time-course metabolomics datasets, the mass balances of metabolism and other biological information could provide sufficient information towards inference of absolute concentrations. To demonstrate this, we developed and characterized MetaboPAC, a computational framework that uses two approaches-one based on kinetic equations and another using biological heuristics-to predict the most likely response factors that allow translation between relative abundances and absolute concentrations. When used to analyze noiseless synthetic data generated from multiple types of kinetic rate laws, MetaboPAC performs significantly better than negative control approaches when 20% of kinetic terms are known
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.