ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022
A Pooling Strategy for Detecting Carbapenem Resistance Genes by the Xpert Carba-R Test in Rectal Swab Specimens.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the potential for specimen pooling to streamline nosocomial surveillance of methicillin-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evaluation of sample pooling using Xpert Carba-R and XpertMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Laboratory detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative organisms.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and accurate detection of carriers of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) in hospitalized patients is critical for infection control and prevention. This study aimed to evaluate a pooling strategy for the detection of carbapenem resistance genes (CRG) in multiple specimens using the Xpert Carba-R test. Two rectal swabs each were collected from 415 unique patients. One swab was tested by Carba-R on the five specimen-pooled strategy. The other swab was tested individually by culture followed by DNA sequence analysis for CRG as the reference. At the first 5:1 pooling testing, 22 of 83 pools were positive, which yielded 34 positives from individual specimens when positive pools were subsequently retested. All individual specimens in the 61 negative pools were retested as negative by Carba-R. Among the 34 Carba-R-positive samples, 30 and four were positive and negative, respectively, by culture and sequencing. The remaining 381 Carba-R-negative specimens were also negative by culture and sequencing. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the 5:1 pooled screening were 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 85.9% to 100%), 99.0% (95% CI = 97.2% to 99.7%), 88.2% (95% CI = 71.6% to 96.2%), and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100%), respectively. Using the 5:1 pooling strategy, our study completed CRG screening in 414 patients with 193 reagents with significant cost savings. The 5:1 pooling strategy using the Carba-R test showed a potential method for screening CRG from rectal swabs with good sensitivity and decreased cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.