ArticlemSystems2022
Selection for Translational Efficiency in Genes Associated with Alphaproteobacterial Gene Transfer Agents.
Article in mSystems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mechanism of biofilm degradation by a detachable tailspike of gene transfer agents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Horizontal transfer of post-translational modifiers brings evolutionary opportunity and challenges to a conserved translation factor.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Targeting Horizontal Gene Transfer to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review of Mechanisms, Drivers, and Multi-Omics Strategies.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Codon Usage Evolution in Viruses: Implications for Survival and Pathogenicity.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- Gene transfer agents: The ambiguous role of selfless viruses in genetic exchange and bacterial evolution.Molecular microbiology · 2025Review
- Co-evolution of gene transfer agents and their alphaproteobacterial hosts.Journal of bacteriology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene transfer agents (GTAs) are virus-like elements that are encoded by some bacterial and archaeal genomes. The production of GTAs can be induced by carbon depletion and results in host lysis and the release of virus-like particles that contain mostly random fragments of the host DNA. The remaining members of a GTA-producing population act as GTA recipients by producing proteins needed for GTA-mediated DNA acquisition. Here, we detected a codon usage bias toward codons with more readily available tRNAs in the RcGTA-like GTA genes of alphaproteobacterial genomes. Such bias likely improves the translational efficacy during GTA gene expression. While the strength of codon usage bias fluctuates substantially among individual GTA genes and across taxonomic groups, it is especially pronounced in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.