Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373921›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Animal seed dispersal recovery during passive restoration in a forested landscape.

Sergio Estrada-Villegas, Pablo R Stevenson, Omar López, Saara J DeWalt, Liza S Comita, Daisy H Dent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Animal seed dispersal recovery during passive restoration in a forested landscape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Realizing the potential of restoration science.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Fifteen essential science advances needed for effective restoration of the world's forest landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergio Estrada-VillegasYale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1072-4921
Pablo R StevensonCIEM, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia 111711.
Omar LópezSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panamá.
Saara J DeWaltDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Liza S ComitaYale School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Daisy H DentSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panamá.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed dispersal by animals is key for restoration of tropical forests because it maintains plant diversity and accelerates community turnover. Therefore, changes in seed dispersal during forest restoration can indicate the recovery of species interactions, and yet these changes are rarely considered in forest restoration planning. In this study, we examined shifts in the importance of different seed dispersal modes during passive restoration in a tropical chronosequence spanning more than 100 years, by modelling the proportion of trees dispersed by bats, small birds, large birds, flightless mammals and abiotic means as a function of forest age. Contrary to expectations, tree species dispersed by flightless mammals dominated after 20 years of regeneration, and tree richness and abundance dispersed by each mode mostly recovered to old growth levels between 40 and 70 years post-abandonment. Seed dispersal by small birds declined over time during regeneration, while bat dispersal played a minor role throughout all stages of succession. Results suggest that proximity to old growth forests, coupled with low hunting, explained the prevalence of seed dispersal by animals, especially by flightless mammals at this site. We suggest that aspects of seed dispersal should be monitored when restoring forest ecosystems to evaluate the reestablishment of species interactions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration'.

Indexed as

ChiropteraSeed DispersalAnimalsBirdsEcosystemForestsSeedsTreesTropical ClimateBarro Colorado nature monumentdispersal modesecological successionfunctional redundancynatural regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36373921
PMCPMC9661942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.