Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373920›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

The framework species method: harnessing natural regeneration to restore tropical forest ecosystems.

Stephen Elliott, Nigel I J Tucker, Dia Panitnard Shannon, Pimonrat Tiansawat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rewilding plants and vegetation.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fifteen essential science advances needed for effective restoration of the world's forest landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. The road to recovery: a synthesis of outcomes from ecosystem restoration in tropical and sub-tropical Asian forests.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Realizing the potential of restoration science.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen ElliottForest Restoration Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-3353
Nigel I J TuckerCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns QLD3811, Australia.
Dia Panitnard ShannonForest Restoration Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pimonrat TiansawatForest Restoration Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1354-1247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As interest in restoring tropical forests surges, so does the need for effective methods to ensure success. The framework species method (FSM) restores forest ecosystems by densely planting open sites, close to natural forest, with woody species, indigenous to the reference ecosystem and selected for their ability to accelerate ecological succession. Criteria for selecting framework species include: (i) representative of the reference forest ecosystem, (ii) tolerant of open conditions, (iii) ability to suppress weeds, (iv) attractiveness to seed-dispersing animals and (v) easily propagated. The method is effective where forest remnants and viable populations of seed dispersers remain. The origins and elements of the FSM are discussed. We review its adoption in 12 countries. Adherence to original principles was mostly high, but some misuse of the term was evident. The need for clearer definitions was identified. We place the FSM on a scale of restoration methods, matched with degradation levels and compare its establishment costs with those of other methods. Obstacles to its wider adoption, both technical and socio-economic, are discussed, along with how these might be overcome. Finally, the FSM is more clearly defined to facilitate its use in contributing towards the goals of the UN Decade on Restoration. This article is part of the theme issue 'Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration'.

Indexed as

EcosystemForestsAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesPlantsResearch DesignTreesWoodactive restorationcost effectivenessecological successionframework species methodspecies selection

Identifiers

PMID36373920
PMCPMC9661958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.