Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373919›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession.

Masha T van der Sande, Jennifer S Powers, Thom W Kuyper, Natalia Norden, Beatriz Salgado-Negret, Jarcilene Silva de Almeida, Frans Bongers, Diego Delgado, Daisy H Dent, Géraldine Derroire and 23 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of defensome genes and mobile genetic Elements in different types of pasture soil agroecosystems from the Brazilian Amazon.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying hotspots for ecosystem restoration across heterogeneous tropical savannah-dominated regions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Realizing the potential of restoration science.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Fifteen essential science advances needed for effective restoration of the world's forest landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 16 institutions in 13 countries.

Masha T van der SandeForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6845-2308
Jennifer S PowersDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, & Behavior and Plant & Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Thom W KuyperSoil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Natalia NordenPrograma Ciencias Básicas de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humbold, Colombia.
Beatriz Salgado-NegretDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jarcilene Silva de AlmeidaDepartamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco CEP 50670-901, Brazil.
Frans BongersForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Diego DelgadoCATIE-Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Costa Rica.
Daisy H DentSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Roosevelt Ave. 401 Balboa, Ancon, Panama.
Géraldine DerroireCirad, UMR EcoFoG (AgroParistech, CNRS, Inrae, Université des Antilles, Université de la Guyane), Campus Agronomique, Kourou, French Guiana.ORCID 0000-0001-7239-2881
Mario Marcos do Espirito SantoDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros-MG CEP 39401-089, Brazil.
Juan Manuel DupuyCentro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán A.C. Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Calle 43 # 130(32 y 34, Colonia Chuburná de Hidalgo, C.P. 97205 Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID 0000-0001-7491-6837
Geraldo Wilson FernandesDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia & Evolução, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 30161-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bryan FineganCATIE-Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Costa Rica.
Mayra E GavitoInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CP 58190 Morelia, Michoacán, México.
José Luis Hernández-StefanoniCentro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán A.C. Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Calle 43 # 130(32 y 34, Colonia Chuburná de Hidalgo, C.P. 97205 Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Catarina C JakovacForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Isabel L JonesBiological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Maria das Dores Magalhães VelosoDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros-MG CEP 39401-089, Brazil.
Jorge A MeaveDepartamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Mexico City CP 04510, México.
Francisco MoraInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CP 58190 Morelia, Michoacán, México.
Rodrigo MuñozForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Nathalia Pérez-CárdenasInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CP 58190 Morelia, Michoacán, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1830-6908
Daniel PiottoCentro de Formação em Ciências Agroflorestais, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Itabuna-BA 45613-204, Brazil.
Esteban Álvarez-DávilaOpen and Distance National University, Bogotá, Colombia.
Yasmani Caceres-SianiWageningen, the Netherlands.
Coralie Dalban-PilonCirad, UMR EcoFoG (AgroParistech, CNRS, Inrae, Université des Antilles, Université de la Guyane), Campus Agronomique, Kourou, French Guiana.
Aurélie DourdainCirad, UMR EcoFoG (AgroParistech, CNRS, Inrae, Université des Antilles, Université de la Guyane), Campus Agronomique, Kourou, French Guiana.
Dan V DuDepartment of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843, USA.
Daniel García VillalobosPrograma Ciencias Básicas de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humbold, Colombia.
Yule Roberta Ferreira NunesDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros-MG CEP 39401-089, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3328-7506
Arturo Sanchez-AzofeifaDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Centre for Earth Observation Sciences (CEOS), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G2E3.
Lourens PoorterForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BRAlexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute · COCentro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza Catie · CRSecretaría de Investigación, Innovación y Educación Superior · MXSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal do Sul da Bahia · BRUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Idaho · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T019018/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chronosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e. crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1-95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and laboratory analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C : N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. This article is part of the theme issue 'Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration'.

Indexed as

EcosystemSoilCarbonClayForestsCarbonClaySoilbulk densitycarbonnitrogenpHphosphorusresilience

Identifiers

PMID36373919
PMCPMC9661943
OpenAlexW4308968699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.