Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373818›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2023

Parental perceptions and experiences of infant crying: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Ingrid Muller, Daniela Ghio, Jasmine Mobey, Hannah Jones, Samantha Hornsey, Amy Dobson, Emma Maund, Miriam Santer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exclusive breastfeeding and infantile colic: a cohort study.International breastfeeding journal · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingrid MullerPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9341-6133
Daniela GhioDepartment of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jasmine MobeyPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Hannah JonesPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Samantha HornseyPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Amy DobsonPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Emma MaundPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive infant crying is common and can have a huge impact on families and well-being. Systematically reviewing qualitative studies on infant crying can provide a greater understanding of parental perceptions and experiences.

aimThis study sought to systematically review and thematically synthesize qualitative studies exploring parents/carers' views and experiences of infant crying.

designA systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched from the earliest date available to January 2022. We selected papers focussing on parents/carers' experiences, views, attitudes and beliefs about infant crying. We excluded papers focussing on health professionals' views and children older than 12 months. REVIEW

methodsThematic synthesis was followed for the analysis of included studies and quality appraisal was conducted.

resultsWe synthesized 22 papers, reporting data from 376 participants in eight countries. Four analytical themes were developed: (1) Experiences and impact of crying; (2) parental management strategies; (3) the role of the health professional; (4) the role of infant feeding and maternal diet. Our findings suggest that infant crying has a substantial emotional impact on parents/carers that often impacts relationships. Parents/carers reported using a range of soothing techniques and coping strategies but were desperate to find effective treatment or cure. Support was often perceived as lacking. Excessive crying and beliefs about the role of maternal diet on breastmilk were reported to undermine parents' confidence in breastfeeding by making them feel their milk is insufficient or harmful, or through pressure from others to stop breastfeeding.

conclusionParents/carers use a range of strategies to interpret and deal with the challenges of infant crying, but there is a need for more information and support. IMPACT: Findings can be used to inform future research and interventions to support families experiencing excessive infant crying.

Indexed as

CryingParentsChildFamilyHealth PersonnelHumansInfantQualitative Researchexcessive cryinginfant cryingliterature reviewqualitativesystematic reviewthematic synthesis

Identifiers

PMID36373818
PMCPMC10100257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.