Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373646›Full record

SynthesisTrauma, violence & abuse2023

Risk Markers for Victimization and Perpetration of Male-to-Female Physical Intimate Partner Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis.

Jennifer J Mootz, Chelsea M Spencer, Julia Ettelbrick, Bianca Kann, Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos, Megan Palmer, Sandra M Stith

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer J MootzColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-4518
Chelsea M SpencerKansas State University, Manhattan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-1103
Julia EttelbrickNew School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA.
Bianca KannColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Palmira Fortunato Dos SantosMozambique Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Megan PalmerKansas State University, Manhattan, USA.
Sandra M StithKansas State University, Manhattan, USA.
Kansas State University · USNew York State Psychiatric InstituteMinistry of Health · MZNew School · US

Funding

Treating Common Mental Disorders in Women in Mozambique by Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in CouplesK23MH122661 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MOOTZ, JENNIFER J · 2021 to 2024
$756k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH122661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) incurs significant public health consequences. Understanding risk markers can accelerate prevention and response efforts, important in settings like Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where resources are scarce. In this study, four databases were searched to identify studies that examined risk markers for male-to-female physical IPV. With application of the socioecological model, we analyzed 11 risk markers for male physical IPV perpetration (with 71 effect sizes) and 16 risk markers for female physical IPV victimization (with 131 effect sizes) in SSA from 51 studies. For male IPV perpetration, we found medium-to-large effect sizes for six risk markers: perpetrating emotional abuse and sexual IPV, witnessing parental IPV, being abused as a child, cohabitating (not married), and exhibiting controlling behaviors. We found small effect sizes for substance use. Employment, age, marital status, and education were not significant risk markers. For female IPV victimization, a medium effect size was found for post-traumatic stress symptoms. Small effect sizes were found for reporting depressive symptoms, being abused as a child, witnessing parental IPV, and reporting drug and alcohol use. Rural residence, approval of violence, length of relationship, income, education, employment, age, marital status, and religiosity were not significant risk markers. Findings highlight opportunities for screening and intervention at the couple level, show the need to test and incorporate interventions for IPV in mental health treatment, and emphasize the importance of further research on sociodemographic risk markers and the interventions that target them.

Indexed as

Child AbuseCrime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceAlcohol DrinkingChildFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorAfricadomestic violenceintimate partner violencelow- and middle-income countriesrisk markersocioecological model

Identifiers

PMID36373646
PMCPMC10583092
OpenAlexW4308954776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.