ArticleEpigenetics2023
Comparison of global DNA methylation analysis by whole genome bisulfite sequencing and the Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip using fresh and fresh-frozen mouse epidermis.
Article in Epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until recently, studying the murine methylome was restricted to sequencing-based methods. In this study we compared the global DNA methylation levels of hairless mouse epidermis using the recently released Infinium Mouse Methylation BeadChip from Illumina and whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS). We also studied the effect of sample storage conditions by using fresh and fresh-frozen epidermis. The DNA methylation levels of 123,851 CpG sites covered by both the BeadChip and WGBS were compared. DNA methylation levels obtained with WGBS and the BeadChip were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation r = 0.984). We applied a threshold of 15 reads for the WGBS methylation analysis. Even at a threshold of 10 reads, we observed no substantial difference in DNA methylation levels compared with that obtained with the BeadChip. The DNA methylation levels from the fresh and the fresh-frozen samples were strongly correlated when analysed with both the BeadChip (r = 0.999) and WGBS (r = 0.994). We conclude that the two methods of analysis generally work equally well for studies of DNA methylation of mouse epidermis and find that fresh and fresh-frozen epidermis can generally be used equally well. The choice of method will depend on the specific study's aims and the available resources in the laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.