ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2023
Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The Usefulness of Basic Laboratory Analyses in Diagnostics of Inherited Metabolic Diseases in Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multicentric Study on the Diagnostic of Neuromuscular Diseases in Children with High Creatinine Phosphokinase Levels.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Age-Related Blood Levels of Creatine Kinase-MM in Newborns and Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Considerations for the Development of Newborn Screening Algorithms.International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the perspectives of stakeholders.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Article
- Uncovering the Embryonic Origins of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.WIREs mechanisms of diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A pilot newborn screening (NBS) program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) study proposes to assess the feasibility of the screening procedure, temporal course of the various steps of screening, and the public acceptability of the program. This is particularly vital to ascertain as DMD is considered a 'non-treatable' disease and thus does not fit the traditional criteria for newborn screening. However, modern perspectives of NBS for DMD are changing and point to possible net benefits for children and their families undertaking NBS for DMD. The aim of this workshop was to establish pathways for the successful implementation and evaluation of a pilot NBS for DMD program in Australia. Consensus was reached as to the rationale for, potential benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators of screening, alongside the establishment of screening protocols and clinical referral pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.