ReviewHaematologica2023
Monoclonal gammopathy of increasing significance: time to screen?
Review in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential life expectancies and life years lost associated with multiple myeloma in the United States: a simulation modeling study.The oncologist · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-omics profiling and AI-driven clinically deployable risk models in MGUS and smoldering myeloma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- [Chinese expert consensus on screening and clinical application of monoclonal immunoglobulins(2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Monoclonal Gammopathy of Neurological Significance: A Case Report and Insights on Treatment.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Multiple myeloma incidence and mortality trends in the United States, 1999-2020.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- What about (MG)US? Towards tailored testing in monoclonal gammopathies.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Determination of the target of monoclonal immunoglobulins: a novel diagnostic tool for individualized MGUS therapy, and prevention and therapy of smoldering and multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is a frequently detected clonal B-cell or plasma-cell disorder. Importantly, every multiple myeloma (MM) case is preceded by MG. Although clinical algorithms now allow earlier treatment of patients with biomarkers of malignancy before MM-induced tissue damage (CRAB) occurs, most patients are still diagnosed late. It is important to revisit how MG should be managed in clinical practice and whether screening is required. As the prevalence of MG and other medical co-morbidities both rise with increasing age, the degree of contribution of MG to disease states other than malignant progression is often unclear. This can lead to monitoring lapses and under recognition of the organ dysfunction that can occur with monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS). Therefore, models of progression to MM and/or MGCS require further refinement. While MG is currently detected incidentally, a case for screening has been made with ongoing studies in this area. Screening has the potential benefit of earlier detection and prevention of both MGCS and delayed MM presentations, but important drawbacks include the psychosocial impact on individuals and resource burden on healthcare services. MG terminology should transition alongside our increasing understanding of the condition and genomic characterization that have already begun to revise the MG nomenclature. The biology of MG has been poorly understood and is often inferred from the biology of MM, which is unhelpful. We review the literature and case for MG screening in this paper. In particular, we highlight areas that require focus to establish screening for MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.