Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373250›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2023

Monoclonal gammopathy of increasing significance: time to screen?

Lucia Y Chen, Mark Drayson, Christopher Bunce, Karthik Ramasamy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Comprehensive Review of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Monoclonal Gammopathy of Neurological Significance: A Case Report and Insights on Treatment.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia Y ChenOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
Mark DraysonUniversity of Birmingham.
Christopher BunceUniversity of Birmingham.
Karthik RamasamyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. karthik.ramasamy@ndcls.ox.ac.uk.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V037439/1Medical Research Council MR/V037439/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is a frequently detected clonal B-cell or plasma-cell disorder. Importantly, every multiple myeloma (MM) case is preceded by MG. Although clinical algorithms now allow earlier treatment of patients with biomarkers of malignancy before MM-induced tissue damage (CRAB) occurs, most patients are still diagnosed late. It is important to revisit how MG should be managed in clinical practice and whether screening is required. As the prevalence of MG and other medical co-morbidities both rise with increasing age, the degree of contribution of MG to disease states other than malignant progression is often unclear. This can lead to monitoring lapses and under recognition of the organ dysfunction that can occur with monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS). Therefore, models of progression to MM and/or MGCS require further refinement. While MG is currently detected incidentally, a case for screening has been made with ongoing studies in this area. Screening has the potential benefit of earlier detection and prevention of both MGCS and delayed MM presentations, but important drawbacks include the psychosocial impact on individuals and resource burden on healthcare services. MG terminology should transition alongside our increasing understanding of the condition and genomic characterization that have already begun to revise the MG nomenclature. The biology of MG has been poorly understood and is often inferred from the biology of MM, which is unhelpful. We review the literature and case for MG screening in this paper. In particular, we highlight areas that require focus to establish screening for MG.

Indexed as

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaParaproteinemiasB-LymphocytesDisease ProgressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID36373250
PMCPMC10233333
OpenAlexW4308876200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.