Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373233›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Use of Teletherapy for allied health interventions in community-based disability services: A scoping review of user perspectives.

Cloe Benz, Richard Norman, Delia Hendrie, Mai Welsh, Mia Huntley, Suzanne Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cloe BenzSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Richard NormanSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Delia HendrieSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Mai WelshRocky Bay, Mosman, Australia.
Mia HuntleyRocky Bay, Mosman, Australia.
Suzanne RobinsonSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Curtin University · AUSydney Institute of Marine Science · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the experiences and perspectives of users of teletherapy living with a disability and working with them, offers the potential to improve its capacity to meet their requirements. Literature examining the effectiveness of interventions delivered via teletherapy often fail to explore the motivators and implementation needs of the users. The scoping review aimed to examine the research evidence addressing user perspectives of teletherapy in delivery of allied health interventions to the disability community. The Joanna Briggs scoping review protocol methodology was employed with searches completed across five databases (ProQuest, CINAHL (EBSCO), Medline (OVID), Scopus, Google Scholar) in September 2021. The search yielded a total of 1365 results, 147 progressed to full text screening and 22 articles included in thematic analysis. Findings were split into themes addressing organisational and implementation based considerations for teletherapy, and secondly the social and contextual considerations of the Target Participants. The two areas of interest were addressed under each theme some of which include resourcing and upskilling, financial, challenging the status quo, moving from hands on to coaching and the utilisation of a hybrid model of intervention delivery. Teletherapy is viewed as creating a distinct set of benefits and challenges compared to in person service delivery, which impact individual members of the disability community differently. The scoping review identifies a strong need from recipients to trial teletherapy and experience it personally to facilitate understanding of how it can best suit an individual. More than being viewed as an alternative to in person services, teletherapy is viewed by users as better suited as a complementary service with flexibility of hybrid model opportunities valued above exclusive use of one over the other.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesPersons with DisabilitiesHumansPopulation Groupsallied healthdisabilityimplementationscoping reviewTeletherapyuser perspective

Identifiers

PMID36373233
PMCPMC10099871
OpenAlexW4308957886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.