Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373224›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2023

Identification, characterization, and rescue of CRISPR/Cas9 generated wheat SPO11-1 mutants.

Lucy Hyde, Kim Osman, Mark Winfield, Eugenio Sanchez-Moran, James D Higgins, Ian R Henderson, Caroline Sparks, F Chris H Franklin, Keith J Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fighting wheat powdery mildew: from genes to fields.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
  10. Engineering apomixis in crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Cytological Analysis and Specific Marker Development in Wheat-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Crossover interference mechanism: New lessons from plants.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy Hyde *School of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kim Osman *School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark Winfield *School of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-4806
Eugenio Sanchez-MoranSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James D HigginsDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ian R HendersonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Caroline SparksRothamsted Research, Hertfordshire, UK.
F Chris H FranklinSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Keith J EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBRothamsted Research · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M014908/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W003317/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing crop yields through plant breeding is time consuming and laborious, with the generation of novel combinations of alleles being limited by chromosomal linkage blocks and linkage-drag. Meiotic recombination is essential to create novel genetic variation via the reshuffling of parental alleles. The exchange of genetic information between homologous chromosomes occurs at crossover (CO) sites but CO frequency is often low and unevenly distributed. This bias creates the problem of linkage-drag in recombination 'cold' regions, where undesirable variation remains linked to useful traits. In plants, programmed meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks, catalysed by the SPO11 complex, initiate the recombination pathway, although only ~5% result in the formation of COs. To study the role of SPO11-1 in wheat meiosis, and as a prelude to manipulation, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to generate edits in all three SPO11-1 homoeologues of hexaploid wheat. Characterization of progeny lines shows plants deficient in all six SPO11-1 copies fail to undergo chromosome synapsis, lack COs and are sterile. In contrast, lines carrying a single copy of any one of the three wild-type homoeologues are phenotypically indistinguishable from unedited plants both in terms of vegetative growth and fertility. However, cytogenetic analysis of the edited plants suggests that homoeologues differ in their ability to generate COs and in the dynamics of synapsis. In addition, we show that the transformation of wheat mutants carrying six edited copies of SPO11-1 with the TaSPO11-1B gene, restores synapsis, CO formation, and fertility and hence opens a route to modifying recombination in this agronomically important crop.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsTriticumChromosomesMeiosisPlant Breedinggenome editingmeiosisSPO11-1wheat CRISPR/Cas9wheat transformation

Identifiers

PMID36373224
PMCPMC9884015
OpenAlexW4308952054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.