Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36373162›Full record

ReviewExpert review of medical devices2022

MRI-guided endovascular intervention: current methods and future potential.

Bridget F Kilbride, Kazim H Narsinh, Caroline D Jordan, Kerstin Mueller, Teri Moore, Alastair J Martin, Mark W Wilson, Steven W Hetts

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of medical devices, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A Novel Omnidirectional Marker for Catheter Tracking in endovascular MRI Applications at 0.55T.Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine ... Scientific Meeting and Exhibition. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bridget F KilbrideDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-6038
Kazim H NarsinhDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Caroline D JordanEnMed, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX, USA.
Kerstin MuellerSiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Malvern, PA, USA.
Teri MooreDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alastair J MartinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark W WilsonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Steven W HettsDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USSiemens (United States) · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Endovascular Magnetic Catheter for Interventional MRIR01EB012031 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HETTS, STEVEN WILLIAM, MARTIN, ALASTAIR J · 2011 to 2021
$4.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImage-guided endovascular interventions, performed using the insertion and navigation of catheters through the vasculature, have been increasing in number over the years, as minimally invasive procedures continue to replace invasive surgical procedures. Such endovascular interventions are almost exclusively performed under x-ray fluoroscopy, which has the best spatial and temporal resolution of all clinical imaging modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers unique advantages and could be an attractive alternative to conventional x-ray guidance, but also brings with it distinctive challenges. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the benefits and limitations of MRI-guided endovascular interventions are addressed, systems and devices for guiding such interventions are summarized, and clinical applications are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: MRI-guided endovascular interventions are still relatively new to the interventional radiology field, since significant technical hurdles remain to justify significant costs and demonstrate safety, design, and robustness. Clinical applications of MRI-guided interventions are promising but their full potential may not be realized until proper tools designed to function in the MRI environment are available. Translational research and further preclinical studies are needed before MRI-guided interventions will be practical in a clinical interventional setting.

Indexed as

CathetersMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansendovascular interventioninterventional MRIinterventional radiologyminimally invasive surgeryMRI-guidedMRI safetyreal-time MRIrobot-assisted

Identifiers

PMID36373162
PMCPMC9869980
OpenAlexW4308982929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.