ArticleCircuits, systems, and signal processing2023
Fooling the Big Picture in Classification Tasks.
Article in Circuits, systems, and signal processing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally perturbed adversarial examples were shown to drastically reduce the performance of one-stage classifiers while being imperceptible. This paper investigates the susceptibility of hierarchical classifiers, which use fine and coarse level output categories, to adversarial attacks. We formulate a program that encodes minimax constraints to induce misclassification of the coarse class of a hierarchical classifier (e.g., changing the prediction of a 'monkey' to a 'vehicle' instead of some 'animal'). Subsequently, we develop solutions based on convex relaxations of said program. An algorithm is obtained using the alternating direction method of multipliers with competitive performance in comparison with state-of-the-art solvers. We show the ability of our approach to fool the coarse classification through a set of measures such as the relative loss in coarse classification accuracy and imperceptibility factors. In comparison with perturbations generated for one-stage classifiers, we show that fooling a classifier about the 'big picture' requires higher perturbation levels which results in lower imperceptibility. We also examine the impact of different label groupings on the performance of the proposed attacks. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00034-022-02226-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.