ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023
In vivo T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential of low-field MRI for global dementia care.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Motion-corrected brain MRI at ultralow field (64 mT).Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Rapid quantitative MRI at 46 mT: Accelerated TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Characterization of Portable Ultra-Low Field MRI Scanners for Multi-Center Structural Neuroimaging.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Modality-level obstacles and initiatives to improve representation in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research samples.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Ultra-low-field brain MRI morphometry: Test-retest reliability and correspondence to high-field MRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Case Report: Ultralow-field portable MRI improves the diagnosis of congenital hydrocephalus.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Review
- Repeatability and reproducibility of rapid TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Applications, limitations and advancements of ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging: A scoping review.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Improving portable low-field MRI image quality through image-to-image translation using paired low- and high-field images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Development of neonatal-specific sequences for portable ultralow field magnetic resonance brain imaging: a prospective, single-centre, cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility of bedside portable MRI in neonates and children during ECLS.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- In vivo TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUltralow-field (ULF) point-of-care MRI systems allow image acquisition without interrupting medical provision, with neonatal clinical care being an important potential application. The ability to measure neonatal brain tissue T
methodsExaminations were performed on a 64-mT portable MRI system. A phantom validation experiment was performed, and a total of 33 in vivo exams were acquired from 28 neonates with postmenstrual age ranging from 31
resultsReduction of T
conclusionNeonatal T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.