Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36372962›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2023

Different pathways for preterm birth between singleton and twin pregnancies: a population-based registry study of 481 176 nulliparous women.

Tiril Tingleff, Sari Räisänen, Åse Vikanes, Leiv Sandvik, Meryam Sugulle, Gulim Murzakanova, Katariina Laine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Distinct birth size and postnatal growth patterns in preterm twins and singletons: an etiology-based analysis from the INTERPRACTICE-21Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Temporal trends and factors associated with live preterm births in Espírito Santo, 2012-2021.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Factors influencing participation in home, school, and community settings by 6- to 9-year-old children born preterm: a qualitative descriptive study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Delaying Motherhood-An Increasingly Common but Risky Trend in High-Income Countries.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiril TingleffFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4722-1148
Sari RäisänenTampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2899-5885
Åse VikanesNorwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Leiv SandvikDepartment of Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Meryam SugulleFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-3978
Gulim MurzakanovaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Katariina LaineFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-8401
Oslo University Hospital · NOTampere University of Applied Sciences · FI

Funding

The Norwegian SIDS and Stillbirth Society 554.04/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the contribution of pregnancy-related complications on the prevalence of extremely, very and late preterm births in singleton and twin pregnancies. To study the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies.

designPopulation-based registry study.

settingMedical birth registry of Norway and Statistics Norway. POPULATION: Nulliparous women with singleton (n = 472 449) or twin (n = 8727) births during 1999-2018.

methodsPrevalence rates of pregnancy-related complications for extremely, very and late preterm birth in twin and singleton pregnancies were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess odds ratios for preterm birth, adjusted for obstetric and socio-economic factors.

main outcome measuresExtremely preterm (<28

resultsPreterm birth was significantly more prevalent in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies in all categories: all preterm (54.7% vs 6.1%), extremely preterm (3.6% vs 0.4%), very preterm (18.2% vs 1.4%) and late preterm (33.0% vs 4.3%) births. Stillbirth, congenital malformation and pre-eclampsia were more prevalent in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies, but the prevalence of complications differed in the three categories of preterm birth. Pre-eclampsia was more prevalent in singleton than in twin pregnancies ending in extremely and very preterm birth. The adjusted odds of spontaneous preterm live birth were between 19- and 54-fold greater in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies.

conclusionsSingleton and twin pregnancies seem to have different pathways leading to extremely, very and late preterm birth.

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParityPregnancyPregnancy, TwinRegistriesRetrospective Studiesepidemiologyextremely preterm birthlate preterm birthpreterm birthtwin pregnancyvery preterm birth

Identifiers

PMID36372962
PMCPMC10099984
OpenAlexW4308953349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.